ReviewEuropean heart journal2021
Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction in humans and mice: embracing clinical complexity in mouse models.
Review in European heart journal, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 92 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
92 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Validation of heart failure algorithm for diagnosing heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: a meta-analysis.ESC heart failure · 2023Pooled it
- Clonal Hematopoiesis and Inflammatory Pathways in Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction.Current heart failure reports · 2026Review
- Inflammatory cytokines and immune signalling in heart failure: mechanisms, models, and emerging therapies.Cardiovascular research · 2026Review
- Engineering the geriatric heart to model HFpEF.Heart failure reviews · 2026Review
- Review
- From aging biology to cardiac biotechnology: emerging platforms for modeling cardiac aging.JCI insight · 2026Review
- Sex-Dependent Cardiac Responses to β3-Adrenergic Receptor Activation in a Murine Model of Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction.Biomedicines · 2026Article
- Macrophage-Dependent Intercellular Crosstalk in Multiphenotypic Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2026Review
- A novel mouse model for cardiovascular-kidney-metabolic syndrome: Bridging metabolic, renal and cardiac dysfunction.Molecular metabolism · 2026Article
- Doppler Echocardiography for Assessment of Diastolic Function in Mice.Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE · 2026Article
- Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: current insights and emerging therapeutic directions.The Korean journal of physiology & pharmacology : official journal of the Korean Physiological Society and the Korean Society of Pharmacology · 2026Review
- Strain-based characterization of atrioventricular and left atrial remodelling in rat models of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction.Experimental physiology · 2026Article
- Optimized murine HFpEF models for translational preclinical studies.ESC heart failure · 2026Article
- Excitation-contraction coupling, cardiomyocyte electrophysiology, and transcriptome profiles in two HFpEF murine models: etiology and sex-dependent differences.American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology · 2026Article
- A Road Map to Understanding Cardiovascular Disease in Diabetes: From the AHA Strategically Focused Research Network in Cardiometabolic Health and Type 2 Diabetes.Circulation research · 2026Review
- Interleukin-6 blockade modulates monocyte recruitment to protect against diastolic dysfunction associated with inflammatory arthritis.Arthritis research & therapy · 2026Article
- The Adipokine Axis in Heart Failure: Linking Obesity, Sarcopenia and Cardiac Dysfunction in HFpEF.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Artificial intelligence-enabled deep clinical phenotyping in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: from patient subtypes to precision care.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Review
- Calcium dysregulation in diabetic cardiomyopathy & heart failure with preserved ejection fraction.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Review
- Central Adiposity or Hypertension: Which Drives Heart Failure With a Preserved Ejection Fraction?Journal of the American College of Cardiology · 2025Review
32 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Heart failure (HF) with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is a multifactorial disease accounting for a large and increasing proportion of all clinical HF presentations. As a clinical syndrome, HFpEF is characterized by typical signs and symptoms of HF, a distinct cardiac phenotype and raised natriuretic peptides. Non-cardiac comorbidities frequently co-exist and contribute to the pathophysiology of HFpEF. To date, no therapy has proven to improve outcomes in HFpEF, with drug development hampered, at least partly, by lack of consensus on appropriate standards for pre-clinical HFpEF models. Recently, two clinical algorithms (HFA-PEFF and H2FPEF scores) have been developed to improve and standardize the diagnosis of HFpEF. In this review, we evaluate the translational utility of HFpEF mouse models in the context of these HFpEF scores. We systematically recorded evidence of symptoms and signs of HF or clinical HFpEF features and included several cardiac and extra-cardiac parameters as well as age and sex for each HFpEF mouse model. We found that most of the pre-clinical HFpEF models do not meet the HFpEF clinical criteria, although some multifactorial models resemble human HFpEF to a reasonable extent. We therefore conclude that to optimize the translational value of mouse models to human HFpEF, a novel approach for the development of pre-clinical HFpEF models is needed, taking into account the complex HFpEF pathophysiology in humans.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.