Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34414410›Full record

ArticleBriefings in bioinformatics2021

Detecting methylation quantitative trait loci using a methylation random field method.

Chen Lyu, Manyan Huang, Nianjun Liu, Zhongxue Chen, Philip J Lupo, Benjamin Tycko, John S Witte, Charlotte A Hobbs, Ming Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Briefings in bioinformatics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Zinc finger protein 263 upregulates interleukin 33 and suppresses autophagy to accelerate the malignant progression of non-small cell lung cancer.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2024
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Chen LyuDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, USA.
Manyan HuangDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, USA.
Nianjun LiuDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, USA.
Zhongxue ChenDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, USA.
Philip J LupoDepartment of Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.
Benjamin TyckoCenter for Discovery and Innovation, Nutley, NJ, USA.
John S WitteDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Charlotte A HobbsRady Children's Institute for Genomic Medicine, San Diego, CA, USA.
Ming LiDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0273-6217

Funding

Genomic/Epigenomic Factors and Non-Syndromic Congenital Heart Defect Risk R01HD039054 · NICHD · ARKANSAS CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL RES INST · PI HOBBS, CHARLOTTE A · 2000 to 2016
$13.6M
Random Field Modelling of genetic and epigenetic association underlying congenital heart defects in the presence of disease heterogeneityK01HL140333 · NHLBI · TRUSTEES OF INDIANA UNIVERSITY · PI LI, MING · 2018 to 2021
$724k
High-dimensional statistical genetic methods for dental caries and orofacial cleftsR03DE025646 · NIDCR · TRUSTEES OF INDIANA UNIVERSITY · PI LIU, NIANJUN · 2016 to 2017
$468k
Secondary analysis and risk prediction of dental caries and oral cleftsR03DE024198 · NIDCR · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI LIU, NIANJUN · 2015 to 2016
$456k
Gene-by-Gene and Gene-by-Environment Interactions Underlying Congenital Heart DefectsR03HD092854 · NICHD · TRUSTEES OF INDIANA UNIVERSITY · PI LI, MING · 2018 to 2019
$171k
NHLBI NIH HHS K01 HL140333NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD039054NICHD NIH HHS R03 HD092854NIDCR NIH HHS R03 DE024198NIDCR NIH HHS R03 DE025646
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

DNA methylation may be regulated by genetic variants within a genomic region, referred to as methylation quantitative trait loci (mQTLs). The changes of methylation levels can further lead to alterations of gene expression, and influence the risk of various complex human diseases. Detecting mQTLs may provide insights into the underlying mechanism of how genotypic variations may influence the disease risk. In this article, we propose a methylation random field (MRF) method to detect mQTLs by testing the association between the methylation level of a CpG site and a set of genetic variants within a genomic region. The proposed MRF has two major advantages over existing approaches. First, it uses a beta distribution to characterize the bimodal and interval properties of the methylation trait at a CpG site. Second, it considers multiple common and rare genetic variants within a genomic region to identify mQTLs. Through simulations, we demonstrated that the MRF had improved power over other existing methods in detecting rare variants of relatively large effect, especially when the sample size is small. We further applied our method to a study of congenital heart defects with 83 cardiac tissue samples and identified two mQTL regions, MRPS10 and PSORS1C1, which were colocalized with expression QTL in cardiac tissue. In conclusion, the proposed MRF is a useful tool to identify novel mQTLs, especially for studies with limited sample sizes.

Indexed as

DNA MethylationEpigenesis, GeneticQuantitative Trait LociAlgorithmsAllelesBayes TheoremComputational BiologyCpG IslandsData AnalysisEpigenomicsGenotypeHumansOrgan SpecificityPolymorphism, Single Nucleotidebeta distributioncongenital heart defectsmethylation quantitative trait locusmulti-locus testrandom field

Identifiers

PMID34414410
PMCPMC8575051

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.