Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34414397›Full record

ArticleACM-BCB ... ... : the ... ACM Conference on Bioinformatics, Computational Biology and Biomedicine. ACM Conference on Bioinformatics, Computational Biology and Biomedicine2021

Transformer-Based Named Entity Recognition for Parsing Clinical Trial Eligibility Criteria.

Shubo Tian, Arslan Erdengasileng, Xi Yang, Yi Guo, Yonghui Wu, Jinfeng Zhang, Jiang Bian, Zhe He

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACM-BCB ... ... : the ... ACM Conference on Bioinformatics, Computational Biology and Biomedicine. ACM Conference on Bioinformatics, Computational Biology and Biomedicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Potential of Large Language Models in Health Care: Delphi Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Parsing Clinical Trial Eligibility Criteria for Cohort Query by a Multi-Input Multi-Output Sequence Labeling Model.Proceedings. IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedicine · 2023
    Article
  12. Benchmarking Transformer-Based Models for Identifying Social Determinants of Health in Clinical Notes.Proceedings. IEEE International Conference on Healthcare Informatics · 2023
    Article
  13. Observational
  14. Article
  15. Combining human and machine intelligence for clinical trial eligibility querying.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Shubo TianFlorida State University.
Arslan ErdengasilengFlorida State University.
Xi YangUniversity of Florida.
Yi GuoUniversity of Florida.
Yonghui WuUniversity of Florida.
Jinfeng ZhangFlorida State University.
Jiang BianUniversity of Florida.
Zhe HeFlorida State University.

Funding

Using social networks to map and evaluate team science across CTSA hubsUL1TR001427 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI MITCHELL, DUANE A. · 2015 to 2024
$37.2M
Systematic Analysis of Clinical Study Generalizability Assessment Methods with InformaticsR21AG061431 · NIA · FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY · PI BIAN, JIANG, HE, ZHE · 2019 to 2020
$793k
Optimizing the Population Representativeness of Older Adults in Alzheimer's Disease and Related Dementia Clinical TrialsR21AG068717 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI BIAN, JIANG, GUO, YI · 2020 to 2021
$419k
Optimizing the Population Representativeness of Older Adults in Cancer TrialsR21CA253394 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI BIAN, JIANG, GUO, YI · 2021 to 2021
$392k
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001427NCI NIH HHS R21 CA253394NIA NIH HHS R21 AG061431NIA NIH HHS R21 AG068717
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The rapid adoption of electronic health records (EHRs) systems has made clinical data available in electronic format for research and for many downstream applications. Electronic screening of potentially eligible patients using these clinical databases for clinical trials is a critical need to improve trial recruitment efficiency. Nevertheless, manually translating free-text eligibility criteria into database queries is labor intensive and inefficient. To facilitate automated screening, free-text eligibility criteria must be structured and coded into a computable format using controlled vocabularies. Named entity recognition (NER) is thus an important first step. In this study, we evaluate 4 state-of-the-art transformer-based NER models on two publicly available annotated corpora of eligibility criteria released by Columbia University (i.e., the Chia data) and Facebook Research (i.e.the FRD data). Four transformer-based models (i.e., BERT, ALBERT, RoBERTa, and ELECTRA) pretrained with general English domain corpora vs. those pretrained with PubMed citations, clinical notes from the MIMIC-III dataset and eligibility criteria extracted from all the clinical trials on ClinicalTrials.gov were compared. Experimental results show that RoBERTa pretrained with MIMIC-III clinical notes and eligibility criteria yielded the highest strict and relaxed F-scores in both the Chia data (i.e., 0.658/0.798) and the FRD data (i.e., 0.785/0.916). With promising NER results, further investigations on building a reliable natural language processing (NLP)-assisted pipeline for automated electronic screening are needed.

Indexed as

Clinical TrialComputing methodologies → Information extractionEligibility Criteria ParsingNamed Entity RecognitionTransformer-Based Model

Identifiers

PMID34414397
PMCPMC8373041

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.