Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34414302›Full record

ArticleEuropean stroke journal2021

European Stroke Organisation guideline on endarterectomy and stenting for carotid artery stenosis.

Leo H Bonati, Stavros Kakkos, Joachim Berkefeld, Gert J de Borst, Richard Bulbulia, Alison Halliday, Isabelle van Herzeele, Igor Koncar, Dominick Jh McCabe, Avtar Lal and 4 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European stroke journal, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05980195 (Cognitive Improvement After cARotid stEnting in HyperBaric Oxygen Therapy Trial), which is not on this map. Cited by 119 papers, 9 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
119citing papers in PubMed, 9 pooled it
31.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05980195 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Cognitive Improvement After cARotid stEnting in HyperBaric Oxygen Therapy Trial (CARE-HBOT)

TypeinterventionalSponsorBeijing Tiantan HospitalRan2024 to 2025Enrolled90ConditionsCarotid Stenosis, Cognitive Impairment, Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy, Stent ImplantationArmsHyperbaric oxygen therapy, Standard medical treatment, Risk factor management
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

119 citing papers in PubMed, 9 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 305 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. CIRSE Standards of Practice on Carotid Artery Stenting.Cardiovascular and interventional radiology · 2024
    Guideline
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Trial
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

59 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

  • Commented on by
    2022
5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 13 institutions in 11 countries.

Leo H BonatiDepartment of Neurology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland; Department of Clinical Research, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Stavros KakkosDepartment of Vascular Surgery, University of Patras Medical School, Patras, Greece.
Joachim BerkefeldInstitute of Neuroradiology, University Hospital of Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt, Germany.
Gert J de BorstDepartment of Vascular Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Richard BulbuliaMedical Research Council Population Health Research Unit, Clinical Trial Service Unit and Epidemiological Studies Unit, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Alison HallidayMedical Research Council Population Health Research Unit, Clinical Trial Service Unit and Epidemiological Studies Unit, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Isabelle van HerzeeleDepartment of Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1754-7390
Igor KoncarClinic for Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Serbian Clinical Centre, Belgrade, Serbia.
Dominick Jh McCabeDepartment of Neurology and Stroke Service, The Adelaide and Meath Hospital, Dublin, incorporating the National Children's Hospital - Tallaght University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland; Royal Free Campus, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, London, UK; Academic Unit of Neurology, School of Medicine, Trinity College Dublin, Ireland.
Avtar LalEuropean Stroke Organisation, Basel, Switzerland.
Jean-Baptiste RiccoDepartment of Vascular Surgery and Department of Clinical Research, University of Poitiers, Poitiers, France.
Peter RinglebDepartment of Neurology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Martin Taylor-RowanInstitute of Cardiovascular Science, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
Hans-Henning EcksteinDepartment for Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, University Hospital, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Munich, Germany.
Population Council · INCenter for Health, Exercise and Sport Sciences · RSEuropean CanCer Organisation · BEGhent University Hospital · BEGoethe University Frankfurt · DEHeidelberg University · DETechnical University of Munich · DETrinity College Dublin · IEUniversité de Poitiers · FRUniversity of Basel · CHUniversity of Glasgow · GBUniversity of Patras · GRUtrecht University · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Atherosclerotic stenosis of the internal carotid artery is an important cause of stroke. The aim of this guideline is to analyse the evidence pertaining to medical, surgical and endovascular treatment of patients with carotid stenosis. These guidelines were developed based on the ESO standard operating procedure and followed the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. The working group identified relevant questions, performed systematic reviews and meta-analyses of the literature, assessed the quality of the available evidence, and wrote recommendations. Based on moderate quality evidence, we recommend carotid endarterectomy (CEA) in patients with ≥60-99% asymptomatic carotid stenosis considered to be at increased risk of stroke on best medical treatment (BMT) alone. We also recommend CEA for patients with ≥70-99% symptomatic stenosis, and we suggest CEA for patients with 50-69% symptomatic stenosis. Based on high quality evidence, we recommend CEA should be performed early, ideally within two weeks of the last retinal or cerebral ischaemic event in patients with ≥50-99% symptomatic stenosis. Based on low quality evidence, carotid artery stenting (CAS) may be considered in patients < 70 years old with symptomatic ≥50-99% carotid stenosis. Several randomised trials supporting these recommendations were started decades ago, and BMT, CEA and CAS have evolved since. The results of another large trial comparing outcomes after CAS versus CEA in patients with asymptomatic stenosis are anticipated in the near future. Further trials are needed to reassess the benefits of carotid revascularisation in combination with modern BMT in subgroups of patients with carotid stenosis.

Indexed as

Carotid stenosisendarterectomymedical therapystentingstroketransient ischaemic attack

Identifiers

PMID34414302
PMCPMC8370069
OpenAlexW4232492418

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.