ArticleEuropean stroke journal2021
Oxfordshire Community Stroke Project Classification: A proposed automated algorithm.
Article in European stroke journal, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Integrated analysis of the prevalence and influencing factors of poststroke dysphagia.European journal of medical research · 2025Pooled it
- Diagnostic and clinical associations of serum Isthmin-1 in acute ischemic stroke.Irish journal of medical science · 2026Article
- Impact of Pneumonia on Rehabilitation Outcomes: A Large Observational Study.Archives of rehabilitation research and clinical translation · 2026Article
- Inequities in Stroke Recovery: Examining Sociodemographic Predictors of Rehabilitation Success.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Prognostic Models of Mortality Following First-Ever Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Population-Based Retrospective Cohort Study.Health science reports · 2025Article
- The value and limitations of the Oxford Community Stroke Project classification in the hyperacute phase of cerebral infarction.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Review
- Article
- Utilizing machine learning to facilitate the early diagnosis of posterior circulation stroke.BMC neurology · 2024Article
- The Potential of Gut Microbiota in Prediction of Stroke-Associated Pneumonia.Brain sciences · 2023Article
- Correlations Between Serum CXCL9/12 and the Severity of Acute Ischemic Stroke, a Retrospective Observational Study.Neuropsychiatric disease and treatment · 2023Article
- Classification of Parkinson's disease and its stages using machine learning.Scientific reports · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThe Oxfordshire Community Stroke Project (OCSP) proposed a clinical classification for Stroke patients. This classification has proved helpful to predict the risk of neurological complications. However, the OCSP was initially based on findings on the neurological assesment, which can pose difficulties for classifying patients. We aimed to describe the development and the validation step of a computer-based algorithm based on the OCSP classification. MATERIALS AND
methodsA flow-chart was created which was reviewed by five board-certified vascular neurologists from which a computer-based algorithm (COMPACT) was developed. Neurology residents from 12 centers were invited to participate in a randomized trial to assess the effect of using COMPACT. They answered a 20-item questionnaire for classifying the vignettes according to the OCSP classification. Each correct answer has been attributed to 1-point for calculating the final score.
resultsSix-two participants agreed to participate and answered the questionnaire. Thirty-two were randomly allocated to use our algorithm, and thirty were allocated to adopt a list of symptoms alone. The group who adopted our algorithm had a median score of correct answers of 16.5[14.5, 17]/20 versus 15[13, 16]/20 points, p = 0.014. The use of our algorithm was associated with the overall rate of correct scores (p = 0.03). DISCUSSION: Our algorithm seemed a useful tool for any postgraduate year Neurology resident. A computer-based algorithm may save time and improve the accuracy to classify these patients.
conclusionAn easy-to-use computer-based algorithm improved the accuracy of the OCSP classification, with the possible benefit of further improvement of the prediction of neurological complications and prognostication.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.