Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34414291›Full record

ArticleEuropean stroke journal2021

Oxfordshire Community Stroke Project Classification: A proposed automated algorithm.

Joao Brainer Clares de Andrade, Jay P Mohr, Felipe Brito Timbó, Camila Rodrigues Nepomuceno, João Vitor da Silva Moreira, Isabelle da Costa Goes Timbó, Fabricio Oliveira Lima, Gisele Sampaio Silva, John Bamford

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European stroke journal, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Impact of Pneumonia on Rehabilitation Outcomes: A Large Observational Study.Archives of rehabilitation research and clinical translation · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Joao Brainer Clares de AndradeDepartment of Neurology, Universidade Federal de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8768-7164
Jay P MohrColumbia University, Doris and Stanley Tananbaum Stroke Center, New York, NY, USA.
Felipe Brito TimbóDepartment of Computational Science, Universidade Federal do Ceara, Fortaleza, Brazil.
Camila Rodrigues NepomucenoDepartment of Medicine, Universidade Estadual do Ceara, Fortaleza, Brazil.
João Vitor da Silva MoreiraDepartment of Neuroscience, SUNY Dowstate Medical Center, New York, NY; USA.
Isabelle da Costa Goes TimbóDepartment of Computational Science, Universidade Federal do Ceara, Fortaleza, Brazil.
Fabricio Oliveira LimaDepartment of Neurology, Hospital Geral de Fortaleza, Fortaleza, Brazil.
Gisele Sampaio SilvaDepartment of Neurology, Universidade Federal de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
John BamfordDepartment of Neurology, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7817-8832

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe Oxfordshire Community Stroke Project (OCSP) proposed a clinical classification for Stroke patients. This classification has proved helpful to predict the risk of neurological complications. However, the OCSP was initially based on findings on the neurological assesment, which can pose difficulties for classifying patients. We aimed to describe the development and the validation step of a computer-based algorithm based on the OCSP classification. MATERIALS AND

methodsA flow-chart was created which was reviewed by five board-certified vascular neurologists from which a computer-based algorithm (COMPACT) was developed. Neurology residents from 12 centers were invited to participate in a randomized trial to assess the effect of using COMPACT. They answered a 20-item questionnaire for classifying the vignettes according to the OCSP classification. Each correct answer has been attributed to 1-point for calculating the final score.

resultsSix-two participants agreed to participate and answered the questionnaire. Thirty-two were randomly allocated to use our algorithm, and thirty were allocated to adopt a list of symptoms alone. The group who adopted our algorithm had a median score of correct answers of 16.5[14.5, 17]/20 versus 15[13, 16]/20 points, p = 0.014. The use of our algorithm was associated with the overall rate of correct scores (p = 0.03). DISCUSSION: Our algorithm seemed a useful tool for any postgraduate year Neurology resident. A computer-based algorithm may save time and improve the accuracy to classify these patients.

conclusionAn easy-to-use computer-based algorithm improved the accuracy of the OCSP classification, with the possible benefit of further improvement of the prediction of neurological complications and prognostication.

Indexed as

algorithmOxfordshire Community Stroke Project classificationscaleStroke

Identifiers

PMID34414291
PMCPMC8370065

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.