Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34414174›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in cell and developmental biology2021

Current Trends and Research Topics Regarding Intestinal Organoids: An Overview Based on Bibliometrics.

Meng-Meng Zhang, Ke-Lu Yang, Yan-Cheng Cui, Yu-Shi Zhou, Hao-Ran Zhang, Quan Wang, Ying-Jiang Ye, Shan Wang, Ke-Wei Jiang

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in cell and developmental biology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Breaking the mold: 3D cell cultures reshaping the future of cancer research.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2024
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Meng-Meng ZhangDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, China.
Ke-Lu YangEvidence-Based Nursing Center, School of Nursing, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China.
Yan-Cheng CuiDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, China.
Yu-Shi ZhouDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, China.
Hao-Ran ZhangDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, China.
Quan WangDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, China.
Ying-Jiang YeDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, China.
Shan WangDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, China.
Ke-Wei JiangDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, China.
Peking University · CNPeking University People's Hospital · CNLanzhou University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Currently, research on intestinal diseases is mainly based on animal models and cell lines in monolayers. However, these models have drawbacks that limit scientific advances in this field. Three-dimensional (3D) culture systems named organoids are emerging as a reliable research tool for recapitulating the human intestinal epithelium and represent a unique platform for patient-specific drug testing. Intestinal organoids (IOs) are crypt-villus structures that can be derived from adult intestinal stem cells (ISCs), embryonic stem cells (ESCs), or induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) and have the potential to serve as a platform for individualized medicine and research. However, this emerging field has not been bibliometric summarized to date. Here, we performed a bibliometric analysis of the Web of Science Core Collection (WoSCC) database to evaluate 5,379 publications concerning the use of organoids; the studies were divided into four clusters associated with the current situation and future directions for the application of IOs. Based on the results of our bibliometric analysis of IO applications, we systematically summarized the latest advances and analyzed the limitations and prospects.

Indexed as

bibliometric analysisintestinal stem cellorganoidoverviewpreclinical models

Identifiers

PMID34414174
PMCPMC8369504
OpenAlexW3191566427

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.