Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34414063›Full record

ArticleHealth and technology2021

Emergency care and the patient experience: Using sentiment analysis and topic modeling to understand the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Sharon Chekijian, Huan Li, Samah Fodeh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health and technology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Sharon ChekijianDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, CT New Haven, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5514-3349
Huan LiYale School of Public Health, Division of Health Informatics, New Haven, CT USA.
Samah FodehYale School of Public Health, Yale Center for Medical Informatics, Department of Emergency Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, CT New Haven, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4664-3143

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic has presented many unique challenges to patient care especially in emergency medicine. These challenges result in an altered patient experience. Patient experience refers to the cumulative impression made on patients during their medical visit and is measured by a standardized survey tool. Patient experience is considered a key measure of quality of care. The volume of survey data received makes it difficult to spot trends and concerns in patient comments. Topic modeling and sentiment analysis are well documented analytic techniques that can be used to gain insight into patient experience and make sense of vast quantities of data. This study examined three periods of time, pre, during and post-COVID-19 first wave in order to identify key trends in sentiment and topics related to patient experience. Previously collected, anonymized Press Ganey (PG) survey data was used from three northeastern emergency department that make up an academic emergency department. Data was collected for three contiguous time periods: Pre-COVID-19 (12/10/2019- 3/10/2020), During COVID-19: (3/11/2020-6/10/2020), and Post-first wave COVID-19 (6/11/2020- 9/10/2020). Preprocessing of the data was carried out then a sentiment label (i.e., positive, negative, neutral, mixed) was assigned by the tool. These labels were used to assess the validity of Press Ganey labels. Next, a topic modeling approach from machine learning was used to analyze the contents of the patient comments and uncover concerns and perceptions of patient experiences. Themes that emerged from the analysis of patient comments included concerns over personal safety and exposure to the virus, exclusion of family from decision making and care and high levels of scrutiny over systems issues, care, and treatment protocols. Topic modeling showed shifting priorities and concerns throughout the three periods examined. Prior to the pandemic, patient comments were largely positive and focused on technical expertise and perceptions of competence. New topics and concerns that patients reported relevant to the pandemic were identified during-COVID-19. Comments on systems issues regarding processes to limit viral spread and concerns over family/visitor restrictions were dominant. Although there was evidence of praise and appreciation of the efforts of staff there was also a high level of scrutiny of the processes encountered during the emergency visit. Sentiment analysis and topic modeling offer a unique method for organizing and analyzing the shifting concerns of patients and families. Suggestions of interventions are made to address these evolving concerns. The automation of analysis using artificial intelligence would allow for rapid and accurate analysis of patient feedback.

Indexed as

COVID-19Emergency medicineMachine learningPatient experienceSentiment analysisThematic analysis

Identifiers

PMID34414063
PMCPMC8363088

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.