ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2021
Smartphone-assisted Augmented Reality in Craniofacial Surgery.
Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial intelligence for pediatric neuroimaging.Pediatric radiology · 2026Review
- Artificial Intelligence Applications in Pediatric Craniofacial Surgery.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Clinical evaluation of 3D printing and tissue engineering in craniofacial reconstruction: A prospective observational study.Bioinformation · 2025Article
- Augmented reality navigation for minimally invasive craniosynostosis surgery: a phantom study.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Augmented reality (AR), a blending of both the physical and digital worlds, can be a valid tool for surgeons wishing to plan interventions and attain symmetry. The use of technology has enabled physicians to achieve desirable results. In this article, we describe a method that uses smartphone's simple AR utilities for convenient, cost effective, and time saving perioperative planning.
methodsImages of preoperative computed tomography, along with 3D reconstructed scans were uploaded to a smartphone and used in an affordable application (Camera Lucida) to superimpose the loaded pictures over the smartphone camera. In one case, a 3D computed tomography scan of the skull was mirrored to help guide fronto-orbital advancement, and in another case the loaded 3D reconstructed computed tomography scan was used to prioritize areas of scalp coverage in a complicated case of craniosynostosis with major scalp wound dehiscence. DISCUSSION: Adaptation of AR to assist in the field of craniofacial surgery has been introduced before in several studies that reported the use of computer-based guidance for cranial reshaping. The majority of these reports used sophisticated modalities, combining advanced image registration and tracking with specialized equipment. The utility of smartphone AR for cranial vault reconstruction provided good accuracy when visualizing fronto-orbital advancement and remodeling, together with in depth prioritization of areas in need of soft tissue reconstruction.
conclusionSmartphone AR adaptation proved to be a very convenient tool assisting in the planning of different craniofacial conditions that are time saving and do not incur any additional fees beyond those of the surgery.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.