ArticleCureus2021
Implementation of Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy As the Default Technique and Lessons Learnt.
Article in Cureus, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction Concerns about surgical complications and the paucity of surgical audits have been named as reasons for the slow implementation of total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH) in New Zealand and Australia, despite a majority of gynaecologists who would like to offer this less-invasive approach to their patients. Material and methods This study aims to assess the implementation of TLH as the default method of hysterectomy at a private institution in the Waikato region of New Zealand, and to identify factors related to the perioperative complications and to the failure to accomplish the above procedure laparoscopically in an unselected population. We present 1,287 cases collected over fourteen years with an emphasis on demographics, outcomes, indications for surgery, laparoscopic completion of the surgical procedure and perioperative major complications. Results One hundred and fifty patients (11.7%) were nulliparous and 378 patients (29.4%) had a history of the previous laparotomy. The mean theatre time and SD was 144.84 ± 20.48 min; the mean blood loss was 137.24 ± 69 mL; the mean hospital stay was 2.07 ± 0.31 days; the median uterine weight was 177 g and the biggest uterus removed laparoscopically weighed 1,510 g. Twelve cases were converted to laparotomy (0.93%). The uterine weight had a statistically significant association with the conversion rate. The main indications for surgery were menorrhagia and/or recurrent dysmenorrhoea in 662 patients (51.4%) and fibroid uterus in 228 patients (17.7%). Six patients (0.47%) required blood transfusions. There was a total of 74 perioperative complications (5.7%) and 16 major complications (1.24%). BMI and uterine weight had a statistically significant association with major complication rates. Seven patients (0.54%) were re-operated as a result of a complication. Conclusion The implementation of TLH as default is achievable and is a safe surgical option. BMI and uterine weight are factors associated significantly with major complications or conversion to laparotomy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.