Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34413724›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in cellular neuroscience2021

Stimulus Driven Functional Transformations in the Early Olfactory System.

Carlotta Martelli, Douglas Anthony Storace

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in cellular neuroscience, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Multielectrode recordings of cockroach antennal lobe neurons in response to temporal dynamics of odor concentrations.Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Carlotta MartelliInstitute of Developmental Biology and Neurobiology, University of Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
Douglas Anthony StoraceDepartment of Biological Science, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL, United States.
Florida State University · USJohannes Gutenberg University Mainz · DE

Funding

Defining the functions of olfactory bulb processing via comparison of input and outputR21DC016133 · NIDCD · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI STORACE, DOUGLAS ANTHONY · 2017 to 2019
$479k
NIDCD NIH HHS R21 DC016133
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Olfactory stimuli are encountered across a wide range of odor concentrations in natural environments. Defining the neural computations that support concentration invariant odor perception, odor discrimination, and odor-background segmentation across a wide range of stimulus intensities remains an open question in the field. In principle, adaptation could allow the olfactory system to adjust sensory representations to the current stimulus conditions, a well-known process in other sensory systems. However, surprisingly little is known about how adaptation changes olfactory representations and affects perception. Here we review the current understanding of how adaptation impacts processing in the first two stages of the vertebrate olfactory system, olfactory receptor neurons (ORNs), and mitral/tufted cells.

Indexed as

adaptationmitral and tufted cellsolfactionolfactory bulbolfactory receptor neurons

Identifiers

PMID34413724
PMCPMC8369031
OpenAlexW3187100460

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.