Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34413660›Full record

ArticleClinicoEconomics and outcomes research : CEOR2021

Cost-Effectiveness of Follow-Up of Chronic Coughers in Detecting Smear-Positive Tuberculosis in South Ethiopia.

Endrias Markos Woldesemayat

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ClinicoEconomics and outcomes research : CEOR, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Endrias Markos WoldesemayatSchool of Public Health, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Hawassa University, Hawassa, Ethiopia.ORCID 0000-0003-4275-3695

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionIn Ethiopia, no studies assessing the cost-effectiveness of follow-up of smear-negative chronic coughers in detecting smear-positive tuberculosis (TB) (PTB+) cases have been reported.

objectiveThis article describes the cost-effectiveness of community-based follow-up of smear-negative chronic coughers in detecting PTB+ cases.

methodsTwo alternative strategies of TB case finding, namely community-based follow-up of smear-negative chronic coughers and passive TB case finding, were compared. Participants were selected randomly in the active TB case finding approach, while purposively in the passive TB case finding strategy. In November 2012 and January 2015, costs related to TB diagnosis were collected using structured questionnaires from sample of 60 patients in each strategy. Data on health system cost and direct and indirect costs incurred by patients and their caretakers were collected in Ethiopian Birr and converted into USD for analysis. Exchange rate for the data collection period of chronic coughers was 1 USD = 18.16 ETB and for passive case finding period was 1 USD = 20.24 ETB. Cost-effectiveness was calculated in terms of cost per PTB+ cases detected.

resultsThe overall cost of TB case finding was lower under active case finding approach than under passive TB case finding approach (USD 27.4 vs. 27.6). Active case finding approach was cost-effective by 43.4% and it is highly cost-effective when the duration of follow-up is reduced to 7 months or less.

conclusionActive case finding approach is a cost-effective approach of TB case finding. The cost benefit obtained could be even higher when the follow-up duration is minimized.

Indexed as

chronic cougherscosteffectivenesssmear-positive TB

Identifiers

PMID34413660
PMCPMC8370586

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.