Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34413367›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2021

Differential cell counts using center-point networks achieves human-level accuracy and efficiency over segmentation.

Sarada M W Lee, Andrew Shaw, Jodie L Simpson, David Uminsky, Luke W Garratt

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sarada M W Lee *Perth Machine Learning Group, Perth, WA, 6000, Australia.
Andrew Shaw *Data Institute, University of San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, 94117, USA.
Jodie L SimpsonSchool of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, 2308, Australia.
David UminskyDepartment of Computer Science, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, 60637, USA.
Luke W GarrattWal-yan Respiratory Research Centre, Telethon Kids Institute, University of Western Australia, Nedlands, WA, 6009, Australia. luke.garratt@telethonkids.org.au.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Differential cell counts is a challenging task when applying computer vision algorithms to pathology. Existing approaches to train cell recognition require high availability of multi-class segmentation and/or bounding box annotations and suffer in performance when objects are tightly clustered. We present differential count network ("DCNet"), an annotation efficient modality that utilises keypoint detection to locate in brightfield images the centre points of cells (not nuclei) and their cell class. The single centre point annotation for DCNet lowered burden for experts to generate ground truth data by 77.1% compared to bounding box labeling. Yet centre point annotation still enabled high accuracy when training DCNet on a multi-class algorithm on whole cell features, matching human experts in all 5 object classes in average precision and outperforming humans in consistency. The efficacy and efficiency of the DCNet end-to-end system represents a significant progress toward an open source, fully computationally approach to differential cell count based diagnosis that can be adapted to any pathology need.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsImage Processing, Computer-AssistedCell CountCell NucleusChildDatabases as TopicHumans

Identifiers

PMID34413367
PMCPMC8377024

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.