Trial reportScientific reports2021
A randomized-controlled neurofeedback trial in adult attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.
Trial report in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 19 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 41 citations in OpenAlex.
- P300 Event-Related Potentials as Cognitive Biomarkers in Neurological and Neuropsychiatric Disorders: A Systematic Review.Revista de neurologia · 2026Pooled it
- Neurofeedback for Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.JAMA psychiatry · 2025Pooled it
- A pilot meta-analysis on self-reported efficacy of neurofeedback for adolescents and adults with ADHD.Scientific reports · 2022Pooled it
- Microstate-based Neurofeedback in Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder Population: A Randomized Controlled Crossover Trial.Brain topography · 2025Trial
- Effects of Frontal-Midline Theta Neurofeedback with Different Training Directions on Goal-Directed Attentional Control.Applied psychophysiology and biofeedback · 2025Trial
- Trial
- Mapping the Digital Mind: A Meta-Analysis of EEG Biomarkers in Cognition, Emotion, and Mental Health.Brain sciences · 2026Review
- Effects of 5-Minute Light-Intensity Physical Activity Breaks (Sit-Cycling and Stand-Twisting) on Cognitive Function, Sleepiness, and Back Pain in Physically Inactive University Students: Protocol for a Mixed-Design Laboratory Study.JMIR research protocols · 2026Article
- fNIRS-based neurofeedback targeting the right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (dlPFC) in children at familial risk for substance use disorder and/or severe mental illness: a proof-of-concept study from eastern India.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2026Article
- NINFA: Non-commercial interface for neuro-feedback acquisitions.Neurophotonics · 2025Article
- From lab to life: challenges and perspectives of fNIRS for haemodynamic-based neurofeedback in real-world environments.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2024Review
- The role of impulsivity and binge eating in outpatients with overweight or obesity: an EEG temporal discounting study.Journal of eating disorders · 2024Article
- Study on the treatment of dysphagia after stroke with electromyographic biofeedback intensive training.World journal of clinical cases · 2024Article
- Remote Wearable Neuroimaging Devices for Health Monitoring and Neurophenotyping: A Scoping Review.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Inconclusive results of slow cortical potential neurofeedback for the treatment of chronic post-stroke attention deficits.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2024Article
- Gaze-based attention refocusing training in virtual reality for adult attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.BMC psychiatry · 2023Article
- Current opinions on the present and future use of functional near-infrared spectroscopy in psychiatry.Neurophotonics · 2023Article
- Surface electroencephalographic neurofeedback improves sustained attention in ADHD: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Child and adolescent psychiatry and mental health · 2022Article
- [Neurofeedback technology based on functional near infrared spectroscopy imaging and its applications].Sheng wu yi xue gong cheng xue za zhi = Journal of biomedical engineering = Shengwu yixue gongchengxue zazhi · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is a childhood onset disorder persisting into adulthood for a large proportion of cases. Neurofeedback (NF) has shown promising results in children with ADHD, but randomized controlled trials in adults with ADHD are scarce. We aimed to compare slow cortical potential (SCP)- and functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) NF to a semi-active electromyography biofeedback (EMG-BF) control condition regarding changes in symptoms and the impact of learning success, as well as changes in neurophysiological parameters in an adult ADHD population. Patients were randomly assigned to SCP-NF (n = 26), fNIRS-NF (n = 21) or EMG-BF (n = 20). Outcome parameters were assessed over 30 training sessions (pre, intermediate, post) and at 6-months follow-up (FU) including 3 booster sessions. EEG was recorded during two auditory Go/NoGo paradigms assessing the P300 and contingent negative variation (CNV). fNIRS measurements were conducted during an n-back- as well as a Go/NoGo task. All three groups showed equally significant symptom improvements suggesting placebo- or non-specific effects on the primary outcome measure. Only when differentiating between learners and non-learners, fNIRS learners displayed stronger reduction of ADHD global scores compared to SCP non-learners at FU, and fNIRS learners showed specifically low impulsivity ratings. 30.8% in the SCP-NF and 61.9% of participants in the fNIRS-NF learned to regulate the respective NF target parameter. We conclude that some adults with ADHD learn to regulate SCP amplitudes and especially prefrontal hemodynamic activity during NF. We did not find any significant differences in outcome between groups when looking at the whole sample. When evaluating learners only, they demonstrate superior effects as compared to non-learners, which suggests specific effects in addition to non-specific effects of NF when learning occurs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.