Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34413206›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2021

Ultra-High-Field Neuroimaging Reveals Fine-Scale Processing for 3D Perception.

Adrian K T Ng, Ke Jia, Nuno R Goncalves, Elisa Zamboni, Valentin G Kemper, Rainer Goebel, Andrew E Welchman, Zoe Kourtzi

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Connectivity analyses for task-based fMRI.Physics of life reviews · 2024
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Expectation Cues and False Percepts Generate Stimulus-Specific Activity in Distinct Layers of the Early Visual Cortex.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

Adrian K T NgDepartment of Psychology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 3EB, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-2820-5270
Ke JiaDepartment of Psychology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 3EB, United Kingdom.
Nuno R GoncalvesDepartment of Psychology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 3EB, United Kingdom.
Elisa ZamboniDepartment of Psychology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 3EB, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-9200-8031
Valentin G KemperDepartment of Cognitive Neuroscience, Faculty of Psychology and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, 6200 MD Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Rainer GoebelDepartment of Cognitive Neuroscience, Faculty of Psychology and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, 6200 MD Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Andrew E WelchmanDepartment of Psychology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 3EB, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-7559-3299
Zoe KourtziDepartment of Psychology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 3EB, United Kingdom zk240@cam.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0001-9441-7832
University of Cambridge · GBMaastricht University · NL

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/E012604/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/H012508/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/P021255/1Wellcome Trust 205067Wellcome Trust 223131
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Binocular disparity provides critical information about three-dimensional (3D) structures to support perception and action. In the past decade significant progress has been made in uncovering human brain areas engaged in the processing of binocular disparity signals. Yet, the fine-scale brain processing underlying 3D perception remains unknown. Here, we use ultra-high-field (7T) functional imaging at submillimeter resolution to examine fine-scale BOLD fMRI signals involved in 3D perception. In particular, we sought to interrogate the local circuitry involved in disparity processing by sampling fMRI responses at different positions relative to the cortical surface (i.e., across cortical depths corresponding to layers). We tested for representations related to 3D perception by presenting participants (male and female,

Indexed as

AdultDepth PerceptionFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleNeuroimagingPhotic StimulationVisual CortexYoung Adultbinocular disparitydepth perceptionfunctional connectivityultra-high-field fMRIvisual cortex

Identifiers

PMID34413206
PMCPMC8496197
OpenAlexW3196210875

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.