Trial reportJournal for immunotherapy of cancer2021
Integrated analysis of a phase 2 study of cemiplimab in advanced cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma: extended follow-up of outcomes and quality of life analysis.
Trial report in Journal for immunotherapy of cancer, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02760498 (A Phase 2 Study of REGN2810, a Fully Human Monoclonal Antibody to Programmed Death-1), which is not on this map. Cited by 65 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Phase 2 Study of REGN2810, a Fully Human Monoclonal Antibody to Programmed Death-1 (PD-1), in Patients With Advanced Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma
Who cites it
65 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Anti-PD-1/PD-L1 for the Treatment of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Network Meta-Analysis of 13 Randomized Controlled Studies.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Pooled it
- Prognostic Subgroups for Disease-Free Survival With Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial.JAMA otolaryngology-- head & neck surgery · 2025Trial
- Phase II (Alliance A091802) Randomized Trial of Avelumab Plus Cetuximab Versus Avelumab Alone in Advanced Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2025Trial
- High response rate with extended dosing of cemiplimab in advanced cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma.Journal for immunotherapy of cancer · 2024Trial
- Neoadjuvant Cemiplimab for Stage II to IV Cutaneous Squamous-Cell Carcinoma.The New England journal of medicine · 2022Trial
- Development of an immunocompetent cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma model identifies VISTA and CTLA-4 as targetable immune checkpoints.Journal for immunotherapy of cancer · 2026Article
- Management of Advanced Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma over the Last Decade: A Single-Centre Retrospective Study.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2026Article
- Multimodal Analysis of Aggressive Multifocal Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma Associated with a Germline COL6A3 Truncating Variant: A Case Report.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Perineural Spread and Base of Skull Involvement in Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma-A Critical Review from an Endemic Region.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2026Review
- Review
- PD-1 inhibitor treatment outcomes for cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma in patients over 85: a comparative analysis.The oncologist · 2026Article
- Progression patterns and clinical outcomes in patients with cutaneous squamous-cell carcinoma following anti-PD-1 therapy failure.ESMO open · 2026Article
- Review
- A Real-World Experience of Cemiplimab in Patients with Advanced Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma.Cancers · 2026Article
- Outcome of elective cemiplimab discontinuation in locally advanced or metastatic cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma patients achieving a complete remission.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Recommendations for the use of early cost-effectiveness analysis to inform the health technology development process with an application to cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma.International journal of technology assessment in health care · 2025Article
- Patient Perspectives of Quality Compared to Quantity of Life Regarding Orbital Exenteration.Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery · 2025Article
- Identification of prognostic liquid biopsy biomarkers in patients with cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma treated with cemiplimab.Journal of translational medicine · 2025Article
- Managing Advanced Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Guide for the Dermatology Clinician.The Journal of clinical and aesthetic dermatology · 2025Review
- The Role of Cetuximab in Non-Melanoma Skin Cancer: A Review of Clinical Evidence and Emerging Strategies.Current treatment options in oncology · 2025Review
5 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
24 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTo provide pooled longer term data from three groups of a phase 2 study of cemiplimab in patients with advanced cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (CSCC), and to determine duration of response (DOR) and impact on quality of life (QoL).
methodsPatients received cemiplimab 3 mg/kg every 2 weeks (group 1, metastatic CSCC [mCSCC], n=59; group 2, locally advanced CSCC, n=78) or cemiplimab 350 mg every 3 weeks (group 3, mCSCC, n=56). Primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR) per independent central review (ICR). QoL was repeatedly measured at day 1 of each treatment cycle (groups 1 and 2: 8 weeks; group 3: 9 weeks).
resultsMedian duration of follow-up was 15.7 months. Overall, ORR per ICR was 46.1% (95% CI: 38.9% to 53.4%). Complete response (CR) rates were 20.3%, 12.8%, and 16.1% for groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively. Median time to CR was 11.2 months. Among patients with partial response or CR, the estimated proportion of patients with ongoing response at 12 months from the first objective response was 87.8% (95% CI: 78.5% to 93.3%), with median DOR not reached. Kaplan-Meier estimated probability of overall survival (OS) was 73.3% (95% CI: 66.1% to 79.2%) at 24 months, with median OS not reached. Global Health Status (GHS)/QoL improvements were observed as early as cycle 2 and were significantly improved and durable until last assessment. Kaplan-Meier estimate of median time to first clinically meaningful improvement for pain was 2.1 (95% CI: 2.0 to 3.7) months and was significantly improved in responders versus non-responders (p<0.0001).
conclusionsThis is the largest (n=193) clinical dataset for a programmed cell death-1 inhibitor against advanced CSCC, confirming the sustained substantial clinical activity of cemiplimab in these patients, including new findings of improved CR rates over time, increasing DOR, and durable pain control and GHS/QoL improvement. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ClinicalTrials.gov Registry (NCT02760498), https://clinicaltrialsgov/ct2/show/NCT02760498.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.