ArticleAJNR. American journal of neuroradiology2021
Contrast Bolus Interference in a Multimodal CT Stroke Protocol.
Article in AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Optimization of the Sequence of Computed Tomography Angiography and Perfusion in One-Stop-Shop CT Imaging for Acute Ischemic Stroke.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2026Article
- Contrast bolus timing in CT-angiography and CT-perfusion: insights from a large clinical dataset.Neuroradiology · 2025Article
- Analyzing temporal imaging patterns in acute ischemic stroke via DICOM-timestamps.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Tissue Outcome Prediction in Patients with Proximal Vessel Occlusion and Mechanical Thrombectomy Using Logistic Models.Translational stroke research · 2024Article
- Reducing False-Positives in CT Perfusion Infarct Core Segmentation Using Contralateral Local Normalization.AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology · 2024Article
- A retrospective study of non-equidistant interstitial brain CT perfusion scanning and prediction of time to peak.Heliyon · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
background and purposeWhether CTP is performed before or after CTA varies within multimodal CT stroke protocols. CTA after CTP might show venous filling, and CTP metrics might be disturbed by prior CTA. Therefore, we compared CTP metrics conducted before and after CTA in a large cohort of patients with stroke and analyzed interferences of the CTA bolus with the CTP measurement. MATERIALS AND
methodsWe analyzed 1980 patients (368 patients with CTP performed before CTA [group A] versus 1612 patients with CTP performed after [group B]) in a retrospective study. Mean curves, histograms of CTP baseline Hounsfield units, CBF, CBV, time-to-maximum, hypoperfusion, and core volumes were calculated using the software VEOcore. CTA and CTP interferences were analyzed, and a detection and correction method was proposed.
resultsMean CTP baseline values were significantly different in both groups (41 versus 45 HU within the groups A and B, respectively). However, perfusion metrics, hypoperfusion, and core volumes yielded no significant differences. In 49 patients, the descending flank of the CTA bolus interfered with the baseline of the CTP measurement, leading to erroneously low CBV values. These errors vanished when a correction method was applied.
conclusionsCTP can be reliably performed after CTA without a relevant net effect on perfusion metrics. However, when measuring CTP after CTA, either a short pause on the order of 30 seconds should be observed or an appropriate correction method should be applied. It may help to avoid excluding patients from mechanical thrombectomy by overestimating infarct cores.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.