Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34413063›Full record

ArticleAJNR. American journal of neuroradiology2021

Contrast Bolus Interference in a Multimodal CT Stroke Protocol.

E Kellner, A Rau, T Demerath, M Reisert, H Urbach

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Optimization of the Sequence of Computed Tomography Angiography and Perfusion in One-Stop-Shop CT Imaging for Acute Ischemic Stroke.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

E KellnerFrom the Department of Radiology, Medical Physics (E.K., M.R.), Faculty of Medicine, Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany elias.kellner@uniklinik-freiburg.de.ORCID 0000-0001-9494-2354
A RauDepartment of Neuroradiology (A.R., T.D., H.U.), Faculty of Medicine, Medical Center, University of Freiburg, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-5881-6043
T DemerathDepartment of Neuroradiology (A.R., T.D., H.U.), Faculty of Medicine, Medical Center, University of Freiburg, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-5869-1110
M ReisertFrom the Department of Radiology, Medical Physics (E.K., M.R.), Faculty of Medicine, Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-2742-1940
H UrbachDepartment of Neuroradiology (A.R., T.D., H.U.), Faculty of Medicine, Medical Center, University of Freiburg, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-7264-4807
University of Freiburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposeWhether CTP is performed before or after CTA varies within multimodal CT stroke protocols. CTA after CTP might show venous filling, and CTP metrics might be disturbed by prior CTA. Therefore, we compared CTP metrics conducted before and after CTA in a large cohort of patients with stroke and analyzed interferences of the CTA bolus with the CTP measurement. MATERIALS AND

methodsWe analyzed 1980 patients (368 patients with CTP performed before CTA [group A] versus 1612 patients with CTP performed after [group B]) in a retrospective study. Mean curves, histograms of CTP baseline Hounsfield units, CBF, CBV, time-to-maximum, hypoperfusion, and core volumes were calculated using the software VEOcore. CTA and CTP interferences were analyzed, and a detection and correction method was proposed.

resultsMean CTP baseline values were significantly different in both groups (41 versus 45 HU within the groups A and B, respectively). However, perfusion metrics, hypoperfusion, and core volumes yielded no significant differences. In 49 patients, the descending flank of the CTA bolus interfered with the baseline of the CTP measurement, leading to erroneously low CBV values. These errors vanished when a correction method was applied.

conclusionsCTP can be reliably performed after CTA without a relevant net effect on perfusion metrics. However, when measuring CTP after CTA, either a short pause on the order of 30 seconds should be observed or an appropriate correction method should be applied. It may help to avoid excluding patients from mechanical thrombectomy by overestimating infarct cores.

Indexed as

Cerebrovascular CirculationStrokeCerebral AngiographyHumansRetrospective StudiesTomography, X-Ray Computed

Identifiers

PMID34413063
PMCPMC8562742
OpenAlexW3194848507

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.