Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34412922›Full record

ArticleVaccine2021

Vaccine innovation prioritisation strategy: Findings from three country-stakeholder consultations on vaccine product innovations.

Mercy Mvundura, Collrane Frivold, Anna Janik Osborne, Priyanka Soni, Joanie Robertson, Sandeep Kumar, Jacqueline Anena, Abdoulaye Gueye, Marion Menozzi-Arnaud, Birgitte Giersing and 3 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Vaccine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Mercy MvunduraPATH, 2201 Westlake Avenue, Suite 200, Seattle, WA 98121, USA. Electronic address: mmvundura@path.org.
Collrane FrivoldPATH, 2201 Westlake Avenue, Suite 200, Seattle, WA 98121, USA. Electronic address: cfrivold@path.org.
Anna Janik OsborneGavi, the Vaccine Alliance, Global Health Campus, Chemin du Pommier 40, 1218 Grand-Saconnex, Geneva, Switzerland. Electronic address: aosborne@gavi.org.
Priyanka SoniGavi, the Vaccine Alliance, Global Health Campus, Chemin du Pommier 40, 1218 Grand-Saconnex, Geneva, Switzerland.
Joanie RobertsonPATH, 2201 Westlake Avenue, Suite 200, Seattle, WA 98121, USA. Electronic address: jrobertson@path.org.
Sandeep KumarPATH, 15th Floor, Dr. Gopal Das Bhawan, 28 Barakhamba Road, Connaught Place, New Delhi 110001, India. Electronic address: sdkumar@path.org.
Jacqueline AnenaPATH, PO Box 7404, Kampala, Uganda. Electronic address: janena@path.org.
Abdoulaye GueyePATH, Fann Residence, Rue Saint-John Perse Angle F, Dakar, Senegal. Electronic address: agueye@path.org.
Marion Menozzi-ArnaudGavi, the Vaccine Alliance, Global Health Campus, Chemin du Pommier 40, 1218 Grand-Saconnex, Geneva, Switzerland. Electronic address: mmenozziarnaud@gavi.org.
Birgitte GiersingVaccine Product & Delivery Research, Immunisation, Vaccines and Biologicals, World Health Organization, CH-1211 Geneva 27, Switzerland. Electronic address: giersingb@who.int.
Anna-Lea KahnVaccine Product & Delivery Research, Immunisation, Vaccines and Biologicals, World Health Organization, CH-1211 Geneva 27, Switzerland. Electronic address: kahna@who.int.
Tiziana ScarnaGavi, the Vaccine Alliance, Global Health Campus, Chemin du Pommier 40, 1218 Grand-Saconnex, Geneva, Switzerland. Electronic address: tscarna@gavi.org.
Debra KristensenPATH, 2201 Westlake Avenue, Suite 200, Seattle, WA 98121, USA. Electronic address: dkristensen@path.org.
Program for Appropriate Technology in Health · USGavi · CHWorld Health Organization · CHCentre Hospitalier National Universitaire de Fann · SNProgram for Appropriate Technology in Health · IN

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As part of the Vaccine Innovation Prioritisation Strategy (VIPS), three immunization-stakeholder consultations were conducted between September 2018 and February 2020 to ensure that countries' needs drove the prioritization of vaccine product innovations. All consultations targeted respondents with immunization program experience. They included: (1) an online survey to identify immunization implementation barriers and desired vaccine attributes in three use settings, (2) an online survey to identify and evaluate the most important immunization challenges for ten exemplar vaccines, and (3) in-depth interviews to better understand the perceived programmatic benefits and challenges that could be addressed by nine innovations and to rank the innovations that could best address current challenges. The first consultation included responses from 442 participants in 61 countries, representing 89% of the 496 respondents who correctly completed at least one section of the online survey. For facility-based settings, missed opportunities for vaccination due to reluctance to open multidose vaccine vials was the barrier most frequently selected by respondents. In community-based (outreach) and campaign settings, limited access to immunization services due to geographic barriers was most frequently selected. Multidose presentations with preservative or single-dose presentations were most frequently selected as desired vaccine attributes for facility-based settings while improved thermostability was most frequently selected for outreach and campaign settings. The second online survey was completed by 220 respondents in 54 countries. For the exemplar vaccines, vaccine ineffectiveness or wastage due to heat or freeze exposure and missed opportunities due to multidose vial presentations were identified as the greatest vaccine-specific challenges. In-depth interviews with 84 respondents in six countries ranked microarray patches, dual-chamber delivery devices, and heat-stable/controlled temperature chain qualified liquid vaccines as the three innovations that could have the greatest impact in helping address current immunization program challenges. These findings informed the VIPS prioritization and provided broader application to designing immunization interventions to better meet country needs.

Indexed as

VaccinesHumansImmunizationImmunization ProgramsReferral and ConsultationVaccinationVaccinesCoverage and equityDelivery technologiesImmunizationLow- and middle-income countriesPrioritizationProduct developmentVaccineVaccine product innovation

Identifiers

PMID34412922
PMCPMC8657797
OpenAlexW3193817695

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.