Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34412784›Full record

ArticleJournal of environmental sciences (China)2021

Comparison of approaches to quantify SARS-CoV-2 in wastewater using RT-qPCR: Results and implications from a collaborative inter-laboratory study in Canada.

Alex H S Chik, Melissa B Glier, Mark Servos, Chand S Mangat, Xiao-Li Pang, Yuanyuan Qiu, Patrick M D'Aoust, Jean-Baptiste Burnet, Robert Delatolla, Sarah Dorner and 10 more

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of environmental sciences (China), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 57 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
57citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

57 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. COVID-19 and Water Variables: Review and Scientometric Analysis.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors.

Alex H S ChikConsultant to Canadian Water Network Inc., Kitchener, Canada; Presently at Ontario Clean Water Agency, Mississauga, Canada.
Melissa B GlierEnvironmental Microbiology, BC Centre for Disease Control, Vancouver, Canada.
Mark ServosDepartment of Biology, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Canada.
Chand S MangatNational Microbiology Laboratory, Public Health Agency of Canada, Winnipeg, Canada.
Xiao-Li PangPublic Health Laboratory, Alberta Precision Laboratory, Edmonton, Canada; Department of Laboratory Medicine & Pathology, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6G 2G3, Canada.
Yuanyuan QiuDepartment of Laboratory Medicine & Pathology, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6G 2G3, Canada.
Patrick M D'AoustFaculty of Engineering, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada.
Jean-Baptiste BurnetDépartement des génies civil, géologique et des mines, Polytechnique Montréal, Montréal, Canada.
Robert DelatollaFaculty of Engineering, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada.
Sarah DornerDépartement des génies civil, géologique et des mines, Polytechnique Montréal, Montréal, Canada.
Qiudi GengGreat Lakes Institute for Environmental Research, University of Windsor, Windsor, Canada.
John P GiesyVeterinary Biomedical Sciences, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Canada; Toxicology Centre, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Canada.
Robert Mike McKayGreat Lakes Institute for Environmental Research, University of Windsor, Windsor, Canada.
Michael R MulveyNational Microbiology Laboratory, Public Health Agency of Canada, Winnipeg, Canada; Department of Medical Microbiology, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada.
Natalie PrystajeckyEnvironmental Microbiology, BC Centre for Disease Control, Vancouver, Canada; Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
Nivetha SrikanthanDepartment of Biology, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Canada.
Yuwei XieToxicology Centre, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Canada.
Bernadette ConantCanadian Water Network Inc., Waterloo, Canada.
Steve E HrudeyDepartment of Laboratory Medicine & Pathology, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6G 2G3, Canada. Electronic address: shrudey@ualberta.ca.
Canadian SARS-CoV-2 Inter-Laboratory ConsortiumGroup author details below.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Detection of SARS-CoV-2 RNA in wastewater is a promising tool for informing public health decisions during the COVID-19 pandemic. However, approaches for its analysis by use of reverse transcription quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) are still far from standardized globally. To characterize inter- and intra-laboratory variability among results when using various methods deployed across Canada, aliquots from a real wastewater sample were spiked with surrogates of SARS-CoV-2 (gamma-radiation inactivated SARS-CoV-2 and human coronavirus strain 229E [HCoV-229E]) at low and high levels then provided "blind" to eight laboratories. Concentration estimates reported by individual laboratories were consistently within a 1.0-log

Indexed as

COVID-19RNA, ViralHumansLaboratoriesPandemicsSARS-CoV-2WastewaterRNA, ViralWastewaterCOVID-19Public healthQuality assuranceQuality controlWastewater surveillance

Identifiers

PMID34412784
PMCPMC7929783

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.