ArticlePhysical review. E2021
Mechanical response of packings of nonspherical particles: A case study of two-dimensional packings of circulo-lines.
Article in Physical review. E, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
We investigate the mechanical response of jammed packings of circulo-lines in two spatial dimensions, interacting via purely repulsive, linear spring forces, as a function of pressure P during athermal, quasistatic isotropic compression. The surface of a circulo-line is defined as the collection of points that is equidistant to a line; circulo-lines are composed of a rectangular central shaft with two semicircular end caps. Prior work has shown that the ensemble-averaged shear modulus for jammed disk packings scales as a power law, 〈G(P)〉∼P^{β}, with β∼0.5, over a wide range of pressure. For packings of circulo-lines, we also find robust power-law scaling of 〈G(P)〉 over the same range of pressure for aspect ratios R≳1.2. However, the power-law scaling exponent β∼0.8-0.9 is much larger than that for jammed disk packings. To understand the origin of this behavior, we decompose 〈G〉 into separate contributions from geometrical families, G_{f}, and from changes in the interparticle contact network, G_{r}, such that 〈G〉=〈G_{f}〉+〈G_{r}〉. We show that the shear modulus for low-pressure geometrical families for jammed packings of circulo-lines can both increase and decrease with pressure, whereas the shear modulus for low-pressure geometrical families for jammed disk packings only decreases with pressure. For this reason, the geometrical family contribution 〈G_{f}〉 is much larger for jammed packings of circulo-lines than for jammed disk packings at finite pressure, causing the increase in the power-law scaling exponent for 〈G(P)〉.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.