ArticlePhysics in medicine and biology2021
Volumetric prediction of breathing and slow drifting motion in the abdomen using radial MRI and multi-temporal resolution modeling.
Article in Physics in medicine and biology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Quantifying intrafractional colon tumor motion on 1.5 T MR-linac cine-MRI and applying anisotropic residual-motion margins for SBRT.Radiation oncology (London, England) · 2026Observational
- An open-source deep learning framework for respiratory motion monitoring and volumetric imaging during radiation therapy.Medical physics · 2025Article
- Modeling of artificial intelligence-based respiratory motion prediction in MRI-guided radiotherapy: a review.Radiation oncology (London, England) · 2024Review
- MRI of kidney size matters.Magma (New York, N.Y.) · 2024Review
- Volumetric MRI with sparse sampling for MR-guided 3D motion tracking via sparse prior-augmented implicit neural representation learning.Medical physics · 2024Article
- Modeling linear accelerator (Linac) beam data by implicit neural representation learning for commissioning and quality assurance applications.Medical physics · 2023Article
- Real-time prediction of stomach motions based upon gastric contraction and breathing models.Physics in medicine and biology · 2022Article
- Real time volumetric MRI for 3D motion tracking via geometry-informed deep learning.Medical physics · 2022Article
- A hybrid 2D/4D-MRI methodology using simultaneous multislice imaging for radiotherapy guidance.Medical physics · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Abdominal organ motions introduce geometric uncertainties to radiotherapy. This study investigates a multi-temporal resolution 3D motion prediction scheme that accounts for both breathing and slow drifting motion in the abdomen in support of MRI-guided radiotherapy. Ten-minute MRI scans were acquired for 8 patients using a volumetric golden-angle stack-of-stars sequence. The first five-minutes was used for patient-specific motion modeling. Fast breathing motion was modeled from high temporal resolution radial k-space samples, which served as a navigator signal to sort k-space data into different bins for high spatial resolution reconstruction of breathing motion states. Slow drifting motion was modeled from a lower temporal resolution image time series which was reconstructed by sequentially combining a large number of breathing-corrected k-space samples. Principal components analysis (PCA) was performed on deformation fields between different motion states. Gaussian kernel regression and linear extrapolation were used to predict PCA coefficients of future motion states for breathing motion (340 ms ahead of acquisition) and slow drifting motion (8.5 s ahead of acquisition) respectively. k-space data from the remaining five-minutes was used to compare ground truth motions states obtained from retrospective reconstruction/deformation with predictions. Median distances between predicted and ground truth centroid positions of gross tumor volume (GTV) and organs at risk (OARs) were less than 1 mm on average. 95- percentile Hausdorff distances between predicted and ground truth GTV contours of various breathing motions states were 2 mm on average, which was smaller than the imaging resolution and 95-percentile Hausdorff distances between predicted and ground truth OAR contours of different slow drifting motion states were less than 0.2 mm. These results suggest that multi-temporal resolution motion models are capable of volumetric predictions of breathing and slow drifting motion with sufficient accuracy and temporal resolution for MRI-based tracking, and thus have potential for supporting MRI-guided abdominal radiotherapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.