Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34411627›Full record

Trial reportBrazilian journal of anesthesiology (Elsevier)

Spinal anesthesia for elective cesarean section. Bupivacaine associated with different doses of fentanyl: randomized clinical trial.

Wesla Packer Pfeifer Ferrarezi, Angélica de Fátima de Assunção Braga, Valdir Batista Ferreira, Sara Quinta Mendes, Maria José Nascimento Brandão, Franklin Sarmento da Silva Braga, Vanessa Henriques Carvalho

Open access · diamondAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Brazilian journal of anesthesiology (Elsevier). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Wesla Packer Pfeifer FerrareziUniversidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP), Faculdade de Ciências Médicas, Departamento de Farmacologia, Campinas, SP, Brazil.
Angélica de Fátima de Assunção BragaUniversidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP), Faculdade de Ciências Médicas, Departamento de Anestesiologia, Campinas, SP, Brazil.
Valdir Batista FerreiraUniversidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP), Centro de Atenção Integrada à Saúde Mental (CAISM), Campinas, SP, Brazil.
Sara Quinta MendesUniversidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP), Faculdade de Ciências Médicas, Departamento de Anestesiologia, Campinas, SP, Brazil.
Maria José Nascimento BrandãoUniversidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP), Faculdade de Ciências Médicas, Departamento de Anestesiologia, Campinas, SP, Brazil.
Franklin Sarmento da Silva BragaUniversidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP), Faculdade de Ciências Médicas, Departamento de Anestesiologia, Campinas, SP, Brazil.
Vanessa Henriques CarvalhoUniversidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP), Faculdade de Ciências Médicas, Departamento de Anestesiologia, Campinas, SP, Brazil. Electronic address: vanessahcarvalho74@gmail.com.
Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveAssess patients submitted to elective cesarean section under spinal anesthesia, and the efficacy of different doses of fentanyl associated with bupivacaine.

methodsThe study included 124 pregnant women randomly distributed into 4 groups (n = 31) according to different doses of fentanyl (15 μg, 10 μg, 7.5 μg), Groups I, II, and III, respectively, and control group IV, associated with 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine (10 mg). An epidural catheter was inserted in case epidural top-up was required. We assessed the anesthetic blockage characteristics, negative maternal and neonatal outcomes, and maternal side effects. Statistical analysis was performed using Kruskal-Wallis, Fisher's exact and chi-square tests. The level of significance was 5% (p < 0.05).

resultsThe quality of analgesia, time for the first complaint of pain and motor block recovery time were significantly better for groups that received fentanyl in comparison to controls (p < 0.001). None of the groups had negative maternal-fetal outcomes. Nausea was significantly more frequent in patients in Groups II (10 µg) and III (7.5 µg) when compared to Groups I (15 µg) and IV (no fentanyl). Vomiting was more frequent in Group III than in Group I (p = 0.006). The incidence of pruritus was significantly higher in the groups receiving fentanyl (p = 0.012).

conclusionsAmong the solutions studied, the spinal anesthesia technique using 15 µg of fentanyl associated with 10 mg of hyperbaric bupivacaine provided satisfactory analgesia and very low incidence of adverse effects for patients submitted to cesarean section. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: UTN U1111-1199-0285. REBEC: RBR-5XWT6T.

Indexed as

Anesthesia, ObstetricalAnesthesia, SpinalAnesthetics, LocalBupivacaineCesarean SectionDouble-Blind MethodFemaleFentanylHumansInfant, NewbornPregnancyProspective StudiesAnesthetics, LocalBupivacaineFentanylBupivacaineCesareanFentanylSpinal anesthesia

Identifiers

PMID34411627
PMCPMC9373100
OpenAlexW3193391572

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.