Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34411465›Full record

ReviewAdvanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany)2021

Hybrid Porous Crystalline Materials from Metal Organic Frameworks and Covalent Organic Frameworks.

Ziman Chen, Xinle Li, Chongqing Yang, Kaipeng Cheng, Tianwei Tan, Yongqin Lv, Yi Liu

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Therapeutic Gases in Biomedicine: Updates on Nitric Oxide and Beyond.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Advancing from MOFs and COFs to Functional Macroscopic Porous Constructs.Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.) · 2025
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ziman ChenBeijing Key Laboratory of Bioprocess, College of Life Science and Technology, Beijing University of Chemical Technology, Beijing, 100029, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0386-8932
Xinle LiDepartment of Chemistry, Clark Atlanta University, Atlanta, GA, 30314, USA.
Chongqing YangThe Molecular Foundry, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA, 94720, USA.
Kaipeng ChengBeijing Key Laboratory of Bioprocess, College of Life Science and Technology, Beijing University of Chemical Technology, Beijing, 100029, China.
Tianwei TanBeijing Key Laboratory of Bioprocess, College of Life Science and Technology, Beijing University of Chemical Technology, Beijing, 100029, China.
Yongqin LvBeijing Key Laboratory of Bioprocess, College of Life Science and Technology, Beijing University of Chemical Technology, Beijing, 100029, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1695-3426
Yi LiuThe Molecular Foundry, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA, 94720, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3954-6102

Funding

Basic Energy SciencesChinese Scholarship CouncilLawrence Berkeley National LaboratoryMolecular FoundryNational Key Research and Development Program of China 2018YFA0902200National Natural Science Foundation of China 31961133004Office of ScienceU.S. Department of Energy DE-AC02-05CH11231
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Two frontier crystalline porous framework materials, namely, metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) and covalent organic frameworks (COFs), have been widely explored owing to their outstanding physicochemical properties. While each type of framework has its own intrinsic advantages and shortcomings for specific applications, combining the complementary properties of the two materials allows the engineering of new classes of hybrid porous crystalline materials with properties superior to the individual components. Since the first report of MOF/COF hybrid in 2016, it has rapidly evolved as a novel platform for diverse applications. The state-of-art advances in the various synthetic approaches of MOF/COF hybrids are hereby summarized, together with their applications in different areas. Perspectives on the main challenges and future opportunities are also offered in order to inspire a multidisciplinary effort toward the further development of chemically diverse, multi-functional hybrid porous crystalline materials.

Indexed as

covalent organic frameworkshierarchical structureshybridsmetal-organic frameworksporous materials

Identifiers

PMID34411465
PMCPMC8529453

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.