Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34411327›Full record

ArticleMagnetic resonance in medicine2022

The Coax Dipole: A fully flexible coaxial cable dipole antenna with flattened current distribution for body imaging at 7 Tesla.

Carel C van Leeuwen, Bart R Steensma, Dennis W J Klomp, Cornelis A T van den Berg, Alexander J E Raaijmakers

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Magnetic resonance in medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. A Monopole and Dipole Hybrid Antenna Array for Human Brain Imaging at 10.5 Tesla.IEEE antennas and wireless propagation letters · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Carel C van LeeuwenDepartment of Radiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-3385-5382
Bart R SteensmaDepartment of Radiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-4254-9937
Dennis W J KlompDepartment of Radiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Cornelis A T van den BergDepartment of Radiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Alexander J E RaaijmakersDepartment of Radiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe coax dipole antenna, a flexible antenna for body imaging at 7T is presented. Similar to the high impedance coil, this coaxial cable antenna is fed on the central conductor and through gaps in the shield, the current passes to the outside of the antenna to generate B

methodsFinite difference time domain (FDTD) simulations are performed to optimize the positions of the gaps in the shield for a flat current profile. Lumped inductors are added to each end to reduce losses. The performance of a single antenna is compared to a fractionated dipole using B

resultsAn optimal configuration is found with gaps located at 10 cm from the center and inductor values of 28 nH. In comparison to the fractionated dipole antenna, in single antenna phantom measurements the coax dipole achieves similar B

conclusionThe coax dipole is a novel antenna design with a flattened current distribution resulting in beneficial properties. Also, the flexible design of the coax dipoles allows better adaptation to the body curvature and can potentially be used for a wide range of imaging targets.

Indexed as

Magnetic Resonance ImagingEquipment DesignHumansPhantoms, Imagingbody imagingcoaxialdipoleflexibleRF-transmitultra high field

Identifiers

PMID34411327
PMCPMC9292881

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.