Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34411121›Full record

ArticlePloS one2021

A machine learning approach to predict extreme inactivity in COPD patients using non-activity-related clinical data.

Bernard Aguilaniu, David Hess, Eric Kelkel, Amandine Briault, Marie Destors, Jacques Boutros, Pei Zhi Li, Anestis Antoniadis

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Exploring Relevance of Graded Sputum Production in Stable COPD in Clinical Practice.International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Artificial Intelligence Techniques to Predict the Airway Disorders Illness: A Systematic Review.Archives of computational methods in engineering : state of the art reviews · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Bernard AguilaniuFaculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, Grenoble Alps University, Grenoble, La Tronche, France.ORCID 0000-0002-9063-9881
David HessColibri-Pneumo Program, Association for Consolidation of Knowledge and Practices of Pulmonology, Grenoble, France.
Eric KelkelCentre Hospitalier Metropole Savoie, Chambery, France.
Amandine BriaultCHU Grenoble Alpes, La Tronche, France.
Marie DestorsCHU Grenoble Alpes, La Tronche, France.
Jacques BoutrosDepartment of Pulmonary Medicine and Oncology, CHU de Nice, FHU OncoAge, Université Côte d'Azur, Nice, France.ORCID 0000-0002-6468-1648
Pei Zhi LiRespiratory Epidemiology and Clinical Research Unit, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Anestis AntoniadisJean Kuntzmann Laboratory, Grenoble, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Facilitating the identification of extreme inactivity (EI) has the potential to improve morbidity and mortality in COPD patients. Apart from patients with obvious EI, the identification of a such behavior during a real-life consultation is unreliable. We therefore describe a machine learning algorithm to screen for EI, as actimetry measurements are difficult to implement. Complete datasets for 1409 COPD patients were obtained from COLIBRI-COPD, a database of clinicopathological data submitted by French pulmonologists. Patient- and pulmonologist-reported estimates of PA quantity (daily walking time) and intensity (domestic, recreational, or fitness-directed) were first used to assign patients to one of four PA groups (extremely inactive [EI], overtly active [OA], intermediate [INT], inconclusive [INC]). The algorithm was developed by (i) using data from 80% of patients in the EI and OA groups to identify 'phenotype signatures' of non-PA-related clinical variables most closely associated with EI or OA; (ii) testing its predictive validity using data from the remaining 20% of EI and OA patients; and (iii) applying the algorithm to identify EI patients in the INT and INC groups. The algorithm's overall error for predicting EI status among EI and OA patients was 13.7%, with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.84 (95% confidence intervals: 0.75-0.92). Of the 577 patients in the INT/INC groups, 306 (53%) were reclassified as EI by the algorithm. Patient- and physician- reported estimation may underestimate EI in a large proportion of COPD patients. This algorithm may assist physicians in identifying patients in urgent need of interventions to promote PA.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsDecision MakingLife StyleMachine LearningSedentary BehaviorAgedFemaleHumansMalePulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveROC Curve

Identifiers

PMID34411121
PMCPMC8376055

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.