Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34411101›Full record

ReviewPLoS neglected tropical diseases2021

Changing epidemiology of dengue in Sri Lanka-Challenges for the future.

Gathsaurie Neelika Malavige, Chandima Jeewandara, Azhar Ghouse, Gayasha Somathilake, Hasitha Tissera

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed
9.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 69 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Mechanistic Modeling ofGeoHealth · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Per vaginal bleeding-an important but ignored feature of dengue.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2024
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Gathsaurie Neelika MalavigeCentre for Dengue Research, University of Sri Jayewardenepura, Nugegoda, Sri Lanka.ORCID 0000-0001-9201-0449
Chandima JeewandaraCentre for Dengue Research, University of Sri Jayewardenepura, Nugegoda, Sri Lanka.
Azhar GhouseEpidemiology Unit, Ministry of Health, Colombo, Sri Lanka.ORCID 0000-0002-9635-131X
Gayasha SomathilakeAllergy Immunology and Cell Biology Unit (AICBU), Department of Immunology and Molecular Medicine, University of Sri Jayewardenepura, Nugegoda, Sri Lanka.
Hasitha TisseraEpidemiology Unit, Ministry of Health, Colombo, Sri Lanka.
University of Sri Jayewardenepura · LKMinistry of Health, Nutrition and Indigenous Medicine · LK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDengue infections are on the rise in Sri Lanka and are spreading to all areas in the country. Here, we discuss the changes in dengue epidemiology in Sri Lanka in relation to changes in age distribution, changes in seroprevalence rates over time, and possible reasons contributing to such changes. METHODS AND

findingsAlthough the incidence of dengue increased 20-fold from the year 2000 to 2012 and a further 3-fold from 2012 to 2019, this increase is not reflected in a similar increase in the age-stratified seropositivity rates for dengue. For instance, the annual seroconversion rates were 0.76% in 2013 and 0.91% in 2017. The annual seroconversion rates in the 6 to 17 age group were 1.5% per year in 2003, 3.9% in 2013, and 4.1% in 2017. In addition, although a 13-fold increase in dengue was seen in those who were <19 years of age, a 52.4-fold increase was seen in the 40- to 59-year age group. The case fatality rates (CFRs) have similarly changed, with 61.8% of deaths occurring in those <19 years of age in the year 2000, while in 2012 to 2018, the highest CFR were seen in those who were aged 20 to 39 years. Although there has been a marked increase in the number of cases, the vector densities did not change during a 4-year period. The proportion of adult individuals experiencing a secondary dengue infection has also remained between 65% and 75% between the years 2004 and 2018.

conclusionsA change in the ratio of symptomatic to asymptomatic infections can give rise to changes in the reported incidence of dengue. In order to take an appropriate policy decision in dengue control activities, it would be important to study the changes in virus serotypes, vector dispersion, and densities. Further, the contribution of the rise in metabolic diseases to an increase in the symptomatic as well as more severe infections due to dengue is explored.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAge DistributionChildChild, PreschoolDengueHumansIncidenceInfantInfant, NewbornMiddle AgedSri LankaYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID34411101
PMCPMC8375976
OpenAlexW3193453586

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.