ArticleIn vivo (Athens, Greece)
Article in In vivo (Athens, Greece). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Electrospun Fiber Surface Roughness Modulates Human Monocyte-Derived Macrophage Phenotype.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
- Retraction · 2022-09-01Error in Analyses · Error in Data · Error in Methods ·
- RetractedRetraction.The paper entitled “In Vitro and Ex Vivo Analysis of Collagen Foams for Soft and Hard Tissue Regeneration” by Jung et al., published in In Vivo 35(5): 2541–2549, 2021, is retracted by the Authors due to a data management failure, which led to misinterpreta
Authors and funding
8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND/
aimThe aim of this study was the conception, production, material analysis and cytocompatibility analysis of a new collagen foam for medical applications. MATERIALS AND
methodsAfter the innovative production of various collagen sponges from bovine sources, the foams were analyzed ex vivo in terms of their structure (including pore size) and in vitro in terms of cytocompatibility according to EN ISO 10993-5/-12. In vitro, the collagen foams were compared with the established soft and hard tissue materials cerabone and Jason membrane (both botiss biomaterials GmbH, Zossen, Germany).
resultsCollagen foams with different compositions were successfully produced from bovine sources. Ex vivo, the foams showed a stable and long-lasting primary structure quality with a bubble area of 1,000 to 2,000 μm
conclusionCollagen sponges represent a promising material for hard and soft tissue regeneration. Future studies could focus on integrating and investigating different additives in the foams.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.