Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34410565›Full record

ArticleMaternal and child health journal2021

Patient Satisfaction with Virtual-Based Prenatal Care: Implications after the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Cindy H Liu, Deepika Goyal, Leena Mittal, Carmina Erdei

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Maternal and child health journal, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
8.3field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 56 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Prenatal Care Coordination and Well-Child Visit Receipt in Early Childhood.Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine : JABFM · 2025
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Reasons for Not Pursuing Virtual Prenatal Care in 2020 Through 2021 and Policy Implications.Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. AJOG global reports · 2023
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Prenatal Care via Telehealth.Primary care · 2022
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Cindy H LiuDepartment of Newborn Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA. chliu@bwh.harvard.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6985-5961
Deepika GoyalThe Valley Foundation School of Nursing, San Jose State University, San Jose, CA, USA.
Leena MittalDepartment of Psychiatry, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Carmina ErdeiDepartment of Newborn Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Brigham and Women's Hospital · USSilicon Valley University · US

Funding

Maternal Psychosis and Stress as Risks for Offspring Behavioral ImpairmentK23MH107714 · NIMH · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI LIU, CINDY H · 2016 to 2020
$765k
NIMH NIH HHS K23 MH107714NIMH NIH HHS NIH K23 MH 107714-01 A1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe objective of this study was to identify factors related to satisfaction with virtual visits during pregnancy in an effort to prioritize intervention targets for pregnant women during the COVID-19 pandemic.

methodsThe study relied on data obtained from pregnant women (N = 416) who participated in the Perinatal Experiences and COVID-19 Effects (PEACE) Study from May 21 to November 22, 2020. Using a cross-sectional design, this study examined factors including COVID-19 related experiences and prenatal care changes in association with patient satisfaction of virtual prenatal care.

resultsOverall, women reported being very or extremely satisfied (27.9%) or moderately satisfied (43.5%) with their virtual prenatal experiences, however, 89.9% indicated a preference for in-person care under non-pandemic conditions. Those who completed the survey further into the pandemic were less satisfied with virtual prenatal care (β =  - 0.127, p < 0.01). After accounting for this and other sociodemographic characteristics, COVID-19 pregnancy worries (β =  - 0.226, p < 0.001) and the number of prenatal care changes due to the pandemic (β =  - 0.137, p < 0.01) were associated with lower satisfaction.

conclusionOur findings demonstrate general satisfaction with virtual visits among pregnant women in this study although in general women would prefer in-person care if it weren't for a pandemic. Women worried about the impact of pandemic on their pregnancy, as well as those experiencing transitions in their prenatal care may need more information and reassurance. Additional studies are needed to understand the unmet needs through virtual care compared to in-person care.

Indexed as

COVID-19TelemedicineCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansPandemicsPatient SatisfactionPregnancyPrenatal CareSARS-CoV-2AnxietyMental healthObstetricPregnancyTelehealth

Identifiers

PMID34410565
PMCPMC8374111
OpenAlexW3194053253

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.