Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34410502›Full record

ArticleEuropean spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society2022

Incidences and reasons of postoperative surgical site infection after lumbar spinal surgery: a large population study.

Hui Ying, Zhi-Wen Luo, Ai-Fen Peng, Qi-Kun Yang, Xin Wu, Xuan-Yin Chen, Shan-Hu Huang, Jia-Ming Liu, Zhi-Li Liu

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Lumbar postoperativeFrontiers in medicine · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Hui YingMedical Innovation Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, 330006, People's Republic of China.
Zhi-Wen LuoMedical Innovation Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, 330006, People's Republic of China.
Ai-Fen PengSchool of Humanities, Jiangxi University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Nanchang, 330000, People's Republic of China.
Qi-Kun YangMedical Innovation Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, 330006, People's Republic of China.
Xin WuMedical Innovation Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, 330006, People's Republic of China.
Xuan-Yin ChenMedical Innovation Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, 330006, People's Republic of China.
Shan-Hu HuangMedical Innovation Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, 330006, People's Republic of China.
Jia-Ming LiuMedical Innovation Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, 330006, People's Republic of China. liujiamingdr@hotmail.com.
Zhi-Li LiuMedical Innovation Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, 330006, People's Republic of China. liuzhiliyfy@163.com.
First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University · CNNanchang University · CNJiangxi University of Traditional Chinese Medicine · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe purpose of this study was to determine the incidences of postoperative acute surgical site infection (SSI) after lumbar spinal surgery and its possible reasons in our hospital during the past 9 years.

methodsThis is a retrospective study with a large sample size. The medical records of all included patients were reviewed, and patients with acute SSI were identified. The incidence and possible reasons of SSI were determined.

resultsA total of 7240 patients who underwent posterior lumbar spinal surgery were included in this study, and the total incidence of postoperative SSI was 1.53% (111/7240). Gram-negative bacteria were found to be dominant in postoperative wound infections after lumbar spinal surgery. And Escherichia coli were the most common pathogen in patients with SSI. The rate of postoperative SSI following lumbar spinal surgery was increased at first and then decreased during the past 9 years. Additionally, from 2011 to 2014, it was mainly deep infection in these patients, and then was mainly superficial infection from 2015 to 2019. Patients with lumbar spinal stenosis had the highest incidence of postoperative SSI (2.39%, P < 0.001). There was also a significant difference for the number of SSI cases among different surgeons.

conclusionBased on a large population analysis, Gram-negative bacteria were the most common pathogen in postoperative SSI after lumbar spinal surgery. And patients with lumbar spinal stenosis had the highest incidence of SSI. Increasing the intervention of Gram-negative may be an important step to reduce the postoperative SSI after lumbar spinal surgery.

Indexed as

Spinal FusionSpinal StenosisHumansIncidenceLumbar VertebraeRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsSurgical Wound InfectionIncidenceLumbarSurgerySurgical site infection

Identifiers

PMID34410502
OpenAlexW3195046244

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.