SynthesisArchives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery2022
Short-term outcomes vary by surgical approach in total hip arthroplasty: a network meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- The impact of retaining the femoral stem in revision total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression.Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery · 2024Pooled it
- Systematic evaluation of the degree of joint amnesia in patients after total hip arthroplasty with direct anterior approach (DAA) compared with posterior approach (PA).Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2024Pooled it
- Joint awareness among total hip arthroplasty patients operated through anterior approach versus posterior approach: a systematic review and meta-analysis.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2024Pooled it
- Clinical and Safety Outcomes after Direct Anterior Total Hip Arthroplasty Compared with Conventional Approaches: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of orthopaedic case reports · 2026Review
- The efficacy of tranexamic acid in perioperative bleeding following total hip arthroplasty through different surgical approaches: Systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of orthopaedics · 2025Review
- Direct Anterior Approach and Posterior Approach for Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Systematic Umbrella Review of Meta-Analyses of Randomized Controlled Trials.Orthopedic reviews · 2025Article
- A Comparative Analysis of Functional Outcomes between Lateral and Posterolateral Approaches in Total Hip Arthroplasty.Advanced biomedical research · 2025Article
- CORR ® Synthesis: To What Degree Does the Direct Anterior Approach Improve Outcomes in THA? A Systematic Evaluation of Meta-analyses.Clinical orthopaedics and related research · 2024Article
- Early functional recovery outcomes and return to work after primary total hip arthroplasty: a novel patient reported outcomes questionnaire.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2024Article
- Comparative analysis of the quality of life regarding patients who underwent hip replacement in public versus private hospitals in Hungary.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Which approach of total hip arthroplasty is the best efficacy and least complication?World journal of orthopedics · 2024Article
- Pain and rehabilitation after total hip arthroplasty are approach dependent: results 6 weeks and 2 years after surgery in a multisurgeon, single-center, and prospective cohort study.Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery · 2023Article
- Equivalent radiation exposure with robotic total hip replacement using a novel, fluoroscopic-guided (CT-free) system: case-control study versus manual technique.Journal of robotic surgery · 2023Article
- Causes and predictors of failed same-day home discharge following primary hip and knee total joint arthroplasty: a Canadian perspective.Hip international : the journal of clinical and experimental research on hip pathology and therapy · 2023Article
- Extensive skin necrosis following total hip arthroplasty performed through the direct anterior approach.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2023Article
- Use of a novel imageless navigation system reduced fluoroscopy exposure and improved acetabular positioning in anterior approach total hip arthroplasty: a case-control study.Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery · 2023Article
- Italian Translation, Adaptation, and Validation of the Novel Satisfaction Measure Assessment after Primary Total Joint Arthroplasty: The Goodman Score Questionnaire.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe direct anterior approach (DAA) has increased in popularity in recent years. Proponents cite its muscle-sparing approach and purported reduction in pain and improvement in function when compared to the traditional surgical approaches. There remains controversy surrounding the validity of these claims. The objective of this study was to compare the common total hip surgical approaches in terms of pain scores, functional outcomes, opioid use and complications within the first 12 weeks postoperatively.
methodsA network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCT) comparing postoperative outcomes of different surgical approaches in primary THA up to 12 weeks was performed. PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science and SCOPUS were systematically searched from inception to May 2020. Outcomes included pain scores, functional outcome scores, length of stay (LOS), complications and opioid consumption.
resultsTwenty-five RCTs (n = 2339) were included. The DAA demonstrated statistically significant improvement in Harris Hip Scores at 6 weeks when compared to the posterior and direct lateral approaches. The DAA reduced pain scores on postoperative day 2 and at 2 weeks compared to the direct lateral approach. The anterolateral approach was found to have a significantly shorter LOS compared to the other major surgical approaches. The differences in functional outcomes or pain scores did not surpass conventional cutoffs for a minimal clinically important difference.
conclusionThe DAA led to functional improvements at 6 weeks compared to the posterior and direct lateral approaches and reduced postoperative pain compared to the direct lateral approach. However, these improvements failed to reach clinical significance. All major surgical approaches led to large improvements in function by 12 weeks with relatively low complication rates. Whether a short-term statistically significant improvement in function is sufficiently patient important to recommend DAA as a standard remains uncertain.
Indexed as
Identifiers
34410479What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.