Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34410469›Full record

SynthesisEuropean archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery2022

A meta-analysis comparing the efficacy and safety of gemcitabine plus cisplatin induction chemotherapy in patients with locoregionally advanced NPC.

Lifeng Xiao, Wenyi Kang, Jiayu Liao, Yuru Li

Abstract readMeta-Analysis
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 84% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Lifeng XiaoE.N.T. Department, Southern University of Science and Technology Hospital, 6019 Liuxian Street, Xili Avenue, Shenzhen City, 518085, Nanshan District, China.
Wenyi KangE.N.T. Department, Southern University of Science and Technology Hospital, 6019 Liuxian Street, Xili Avenue, Shenzhen City, 518085, Nanshan District, China.
Jiayu LiaoE.N.T. Department, Southern University of Science and Technology Hospital, 6019 Liuxian Street, Xili Avenue, Shenzhen City, 518085, Nanshan District, China.
Yuru LiE.N.T. Department, Southern University of Science and Technology Hospital, 6019 Liuxian Street, Xili Avenue, Shenzhen City, 518085, Nanshan District, China. liyuru3131@sina.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4568-6144
Southern University of Science and Technology · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeNasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) is a malignant tumor endangering human health. Gemcitabine or cisplatin chemotherapy has been regarded as effective treatment for patients with locoregionally advanced NPC. However, the effect of gemcitabine plus cisplatin concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) remained controversial among the studies. Therefore, we conducted this meta-analysis to assess the efficacy and safety of induction chemotherapy by gemcitabine and cisplatin (GP regimen) in patients with locoregionally advanced NPC.

methodsA systematic literature search was performed using PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase to evaluate the survival benefit and toxicity profiles of patients with locoregionally advanced NPC who were treated with CCRT. A random-effects model or a fixed-effects model was used to pool the data according to the heterogeneity among the included studies.

resultsA total of five studies with 1286 patients met the inclusion criteria and were included in this meta-analysis. Pooled estimate showed that GP regimen was associated with significant improvements in OS (HR = 0.57, 95% CI 0.45, 0.73; P < 0.001), DFS (HR = 0.56, 95% CI 0.47, 0.66; P < 0.001), and DRFS (HR = 0.51, 95% CI 0.36, 0.73; P < 0.001), but not in LRFS (HR = 0.54, 95% CI 0.25, 1.19; P = 0.126) and ORR (RR = 1.30, 95% CI 0.54, 3.09; P = 0.556). Moreover, the incidence of adverse events of all grades (RR = 1.15, 95%CI 0.11, 1.38; P = 0.063) or grade 3-4 (RR = 0.96, 95%CI 0.57, 1.29; P = 0.385), was comparable between GP regimen and control treatments.

conclusionOur meta-analysis indicated that the patients with locoregionally advanced NPC could benefit from the regimen of gemcitabine plus cisplatin induction chemotherapy.

Indexed as

CisplatinInduction ChemotherapyNasopharyngeal CarcinomaNasopharyngeal NeoplasmsAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsDeoxycytidineGemcitabineHumansCisplatinDeoxycytidineGemcitabineConcurrent chemotherapyGemcitabine plus cisplatinInduction chemotherapyMeta-analysisNasopharyngeal carcinoma

Identifiers

PMID34410469
OpenAlexW3193449232

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.