Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34410444›Full record

ReviewArchives of microbiology2021

Comprehensive account of present techniques for in-field plant disease diagnosis.

Ritika Mansotra, Jyoti Vakhlu

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Archives of microbiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ritika MansotraMetagenomic Laboratory, School of Biotechnology, University of Jammu, Jammu, India.
Jyoti VakhluMetagenomic Laboratory, School of Biotechnology, University of Jammu, Jammu, India. jyotimetagenomic@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4643-378X

Funding

government of india, department of science and technology INT/FRG/DAAD/P-05/2017national medicinal plants board, ministry of ayush, government of india F.No.Z18017/187/CSS/R&D/JK-01/2018-19-NMPB-IV A
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The early detection of plant pathogens is an appropriate preventive strategy for the management of crop yield and quality. For this reason, effective diagnostic techniques and tools, which are simple, specific, rapid and economic, are needed to be developed. Although several such technologies have been developed still most of them suffer one or the other limitation. Major limitations of the widely used diagnostic methods are requirement of trained staff and laboratory setup. Development of point-of-care diagnostic devices (handy portable devices) that require no specialized staff and can directly be used in fields is need of the hour. The aim of this review is to compile the information on current promising techniques that are in use for plant-pathogen diagnosis. Additionally, it focuses on the latest in-field pathogen diagnostic techniques with associated advantages and limitations.

Indexed as

Plant DiseasesPlantsHumansAdvanced technologiesPlant-Pathogen diagnosisPortable devices

Identifiers

PMID34410444

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.