Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34410432›Full record

SynthesisAbdominal radiology (New York)2021

Meta-analysis and systematic review of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in evaluating the treatment response after locoregional therapy of hepatocellular carcinoma.

Yang Hai, Esika Savsani, Weelic Chong, John Eisenbrey, Andrej Lyshchik

Open access · greenAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Abdominal radiology (New York), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yang HaiDepartment of Radiology, Thomas Jefferson University, 132 South 10th Street, 763G Main Building, Philadelphia, PA, 19107, USA.
Esika SavsaniDepartment of Radiology, Thomas Jefferson University, 132 South 10th Street, 763G Main Building, Philadelphia, PA, 19107, USA.
Weelic ChongSidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, 1025 Walnut St, Suite 100, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
John EisenbreyDepartment of Radiology, Thomas Jefferson University, 132 South 10th Street, 763G Main Building, Philadelphia, PA, 19107, USA.
Andrej LyshchikDepartment of Radiology, Thomas Jefferson University, 132 South 10th Street, 763G Main Building, Philadelphia, PA, 19107, USA. andrej.lyshchik@jefferson.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8930-2213
Thomas Jefferson University · US

Funding

2D and 3D Contrast-enhanced Ultrasound Evaluation of HCC ChemoembolizationR01CA194307 · NCI · THOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY · PI John Eisenbrey · 2016 to 2026
$5.3M
CONTRAST-ENHANCED ULTRASOUND EVALUATION OF FOCAL LIVER LESIONS IN PATIENTS WITH CIRRHOSIS OR OTHER RISK FACTORS FOR DEVELOPING HCCR01CA215520 · NCI · THOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY · PI LYSHCHIK, ANDREJ · 2017 to 2020
$2.4M
Microbubble Cavitation for Improving Hepatocellular Carcinoma RadioembolizationR01CA238241 · NCI · THOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY · PI ANTON, KEVIN, EISENBREY, JOHN · 2020 to 2024
$1.8M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA194307NCI NIH HHS R01 CA215520NCI NIH HHS R01 CA238241
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeContrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) is a useful tool to assess treatment response after percutaneous ablation or transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Here, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the usefulness of CEUS in identifying residual tumor after locoregional therapy.

methodsPubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane library databases were searched from their inception until March 8, 2021, for diagnostic test accuracy studies comparing CEUS to a reference standard for identifying residual tumors after locoregional therapy of HCC. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) were obtained using a bivariate random effects model. Subgroup analyses were performed by stratifying the studies based on study design, type of locoregional therapy, CEUS criteria for residual tumor, timing of CEUS follow up, and type of standard reference.

resultsTwo reviewers independently evaluated 1479 publications. After full-text review, 142 studies were found to be relevant, and 43 publications (50 cohorts) were finally included. The overall sensitivity of CEUS in detection of residual disease estimated from the bivariate random effects model was 0.85 (95% CI 0.80-0.89). Similarly, the overall specificity was 0.94 (95% CI 0.91-0.96). The diagnostic accuracy was 93.5%. The DOR was 70.1 (95% CI 62.2-148), and the AUROC was 0.95. Importantly, subgroup analysis showed no apparent differences in the diagnostic performance between locoregional therapy (TACE vs. ablation) and criteria used to define residual enhancement, timing of performing CEUS, study design, or type of reference standard.

conclusionCEUS is a highly accurate method to identify HCC residual tumor after TACE or percutaneous ablation.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, HepatocellularChemoembolization, TherapeuticLiver NeoplasmsContrast MediaHumansTreatment OutcomeUltrasonographyContrast MediaContrast-enhanced ultrasoundHepatocellular carcinomaLocoregional therapyMicrowave ablationRadiofrequency ablationTranscatheter arterial chemoembolizationTreatment response

Identifiers

PMID34410432
PMCPMC8569603
OpenAlexW3194961052

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.