ArticleJAMA network open2021
Public Perspectives on Decisions About Emergency Care Seeking for Care Unrelated to COVID-19 During the COVID-19 Pandemic.
Article in JAMA network open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
25 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 50 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Evolving Landscape of Discrete Choice Experiments in Health Economics: A Systematic Review.PharmacoEconomics · 2025Pooled it
- Emergency Department Utilization and Patient Acuity in the Setting of Care-Seeking Hesitancy: Insights from the COVID-19 Pandemic.The western journal of emergency medicine · 2025Article
- How did health service utilization and delivery change during the COVID-19 pandemic? Frontline healthcare workers' perceptions from the Central African Republic, the Democratic Republic of Congo, and Bangladesh.BMC health services research · 2025Article
- Determining Filipinos' Preferences for Colorectal Cancer Screening Tests: Insights From a Choice-Based Conjoint Analysis.AJPM focus · 2025Article
- Changes in Risk Tolerance for Ovarian Cancer Prevention Strategies during the COVID-19 Pandemic: Results of a Discrete Choice Experiment.Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making · 2025Article
- Frailty Explains Variation in Emergency Department Use for Older Veterans During the COVID-19 Pandemic.Journal of geriatric emergency medicine · 2024Article
- Article
- Stroke but no hospital admission: Lost opportunity for whom?PloS one · 2024Article
- Impact of Beliefs About Local Physician Supply and Self-Rated Health on Willingness to See a Nurse Practitioner During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Web-Based Survey and Experiment.JMIR formative research · 2023Article
- Self-reported delays in care-seeking in West Africa during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic.BMC health services research · 2023Article
- Cerebrovascular Disease in COVID-19.Viruses · 2023Review
- Trends in gastrointestinal disease hospitalizations and outcomes during the first year of the coronavirus pandemic.World journal of gastroenterology · 2023Article
- COVID-19 Pandemic Brings Challenges to the Management of Stroke-The Differences Between Stroke Cases Admitted to a Tertiary Hospital Before and During COVID-19 Pandemic in China.Risk management and healthcare policy · 2023Article
- Impact of COVID-19 on Intracranial Meningioma Resection: Results from California State Inpatient Database.Cancers · 2022Article
- Association between racial discrimination and delayed or forgone care amid the COVID-19 pandemic.Preventive medicine · 2022Article
- The impact of COVID-19 pandemic on emergency department visits and associated mortality during 14 months of the pandemic in Israel.Internal and emergency medicine · 2022Article
- Virtual Care Prior to and During COVID-19: Cross-sectional Survey of Rural and Urban Adults.JMIR formative research · 2022Article
- Lessons from the frontline: The value of emergency care processes and data to pandemic responses across the Pacific region.The Lancet regional health. Western Pacific · 2022Article
- Impact of COVID-19 on emergency department management of stroke and STEMI. A narrative review.The American journal of emergency medicine · 2022Review
- Long-term results on the severity of acute appendicitis during COVID-19 pandemic.Surgery open science · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: Delaying critical care for treatable conditions owing to fear of contracting COVID-19 in the emergency department (ED) is associated with avoidable morbidity and mortality. Objective: To assess and quantify how people decided whether to present to the ED during the COVID-19 pandemic for care unrelated to COVID-19 using conjoint analysis, a form of trade-off analysis that examines how individuals make complex decisions. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cross-sectional survey study was conducted using a nationwide sample from June 1, 2020, during the initial peak of the COVID-19 pandemic. Included participants were adults aged 18 years or older in the US who self-reported that they had not tested positive for COVID-19. Data were analyzed from July 2020 through May 2021. Exposures: Participants completed a self-administered online survey. Main Outcomes and Measures: Using a choice-based conjoint analysis survey, the relative importance was assessed for the following attributes for individuals in deciding whether to seek ED care for symptoms consistent with myocardial infarction or appendicitis: reduction in chance of dying because of ED treatment, crowdedness of ED with other patients, and chance of contracting COVID-19 in the ED. We also performed latent class analyses using conjoint data to identify distinct segments of the respondent population with similar choice patterns. Logistic regression was then used to explore whether patient sociodemographics and political affiliations were factors associated with decision-making. Results: Among 1981 individuals invited to participate, 933 respondents (47.1%) completed the survey; participants' mean (SD) age was 40.1 (13.0) years, and 491 (52.6%) were women. In latent class analyses, 158 individuals (16.9%) with symptoms of myocardial infarction and 238 individuals (25.5%) with symptoms of appendicitis prioritized avoidance of COVID-19 exposure in the ED (ie, chance of contracting COVID-19 in the ED or crowdedness of ED with other patients) over seeking appropriate care for symptoms. Having a usual source of care was a factor associated with lower odds of prioritizing avoidance of COVID-19 exposure (myocardial infarction scenario: adjusted odds ratio, 0.49 [95% CI, 0.32-0.76]; P = .001; appendicitis scenario: adjusted odds ratio, 0.57 [95% CI, 0.40-0.82]; P = .003), but most sociodemographic factors and political affiliations were not factors associated with decision-making. Conclusions and Relevance: This study found that up to one-quarter of individuals were willing to forgo potentially life-saving ED care to avoid exposure to COVID-19. These findings suggest that health care systems and public health organizations should develop effective communications for patients and the community at large that reassure and encourage timely health care for critical needs during the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic and other scenarios.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.