Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34410397›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2021

Development and Validation of a Computed Tomography-Based Radiomics Signature to Predict Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer.

Wei Wang, Ying Peng, Xingyu Feng, Yan Zhao, Sharvesh Raj Seeruttun, Jun Zhang, Zixuan Cheng, Yong Li, Zaiyi Liu, Zhiwei Zhou

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter StudyValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 64 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
64citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
12.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

64 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 116 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Clinical-radiomic prognostic model integrating staging before and after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in gastric cancer: a multicenter retrospective study.Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association · 2025
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

4 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Wei WangDepartment of Gastric Surgery, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.
Ying PengDepartment of Gastric Surgery, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.
Xingyu FengDepartment of General Surgery, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, School of Medicine, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.
Yan ZhaoDepartment of Stomach Surgery, Cancer Hospital of China Medical University (Liaoning Cancer Hospital & Institute), Shenyang, People's Republic of China.
Sharvesh Raj SeeruttunDepartment of Gastric Surgery, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.
Jun ZhangDepartment of Stomach Surgery, Cancer Hospital of China Medical University (Liaoning Cancer Hospital & Institute), Shenyang, People's Republic of China.
Zixuan ChengDepartment of Radiology, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, School of Medicine, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.
Yong LiDepartment of General Surgery, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, School of Medicine, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.
Zaiyi LiuDepartment of Radiology, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, School of Medicine, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.
Zhiwei ZhouDepartment of Gastric Surgery, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.
Sun Yat-sen University · CNChina Medical University · CNGuangdong Academy of Medical Sciences · CNGuangdong Provincial People's Hospital · CNSun Yat-sen University Cancer Center · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Neoadjuvant therapies have been shown to decrease tumor burden, increase resection rate, and improve the outcomes among patients with locally advanced gastric cancer (GC). However, not all patients are equally responsive; therefore, differentiating potential respondents from nonrespondents is clinically important. Objective: To use pretreatment computed tomography (CT)-pixelated feature-difference extraction techniques to identify diagnostically relevant features that could predict patients' response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy at diagnosis. Design, Setting, and Participants: This multicenter cohort study included patients with locally advanced GC who were treated from January 2010 to July 2017 at 2 hospitals in southern China (training cohort) and 1 hospital in northern China (external validation cohort). Their clinicopathological data, pretreatment CT images, and pathological reports were retrieved and analyzed. Data analysis was conducted from December 2017 to May 2021. Exposures: All patients underwent 2 to 4 cycles of fluorouracil in combination with a platinum-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy regimen. All gastrectomies were performed according to the Japanese Classification of Gastric Carcinoma (14th edition) guidelines. Main Outcomes and Measures: Reliability of clinicopathological and radiomics-based features were assessed with area under receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and Mann-Whitney U test. Results: A total of 323 patients (242 [74.9%] men; median [range] age, 58 [24-82] years) were included in the study, with 250 patients (77.4%) in the training cohort and 73 (22.6%) in the validation cohort. The baseline pretreatment characteristics of the training and validation cohorts were well-balanced. The number of respondents in the training and validation cohort was 122 (48.8%) and 40 (54.8%), respectively, and the number of nonrespondents was 128 (51.2%) and 33 (45.2%), respectively. No clinicopathological variables were significantly associated with treatment response. Using radiomics, 20 low-intercorrelated features from a total of 7477 features were used to construct a radiomics signature that demonstrated significant association with treatment response. Good discrimination performance of the radiomics signature for predicting treatment response in the training (AUC, 0.736; 95% CI, 0.675-0.798) and external validation (AUC, 0.679; 95% CI, 0.554-0.803) cohorts was observed. Decision curve analysis confirmed the clinical utility of the radiomics signature. Conclusions and Relevance: In this study, the proposed radiomics signature showed potential as a clinical aid for predicting the response of patients with locally advanced GC before treatment, thereby allowing timely planning for effective treatments for potential nonrespondents.

Indexed as

Chemotherapy, AdjuvantTomography, X-Ray ComputedAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsChinaFemaleFluorouracilGastrectomyHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoadjuvant TherapyPredictive Value of TestsStomach NeoplasmsFluorouracil

Identifiers

PMID34410397
PMCPMC8377567
OpenAlexW3195044993

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.