Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34410173›Full record

ArticleThe Cleft palate-craniofacial journal : official publication of the American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association2022

Continuous Multidisciplinary Care for Patients With Orofacial Clefts-Should the Follow-up Interval Depend on the Cleft Entity?

Anna K Sander, Elisabeth Grau, Anita Kloss-Brandstätter, Rüdiger Zimmerer, Michael Neuhaus, Alexander K Bartella, Bernd Lethaus

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Cleft palate-craniofacial journal : official publication of the American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Anna K Sander9180University Hospital Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-2513-9239
Elisabeth Grau9180University Hospital Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
Anita Kloss-Brandstätter9180University Hospital Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
Rüdiger Zimmerer9180University Hospital Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
Michael Neuhaus9180University Hospital Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-3461-5364
Alexander K Bartella9180University Hospital Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-3545-1341
Bernd Lethaus9180University Hospital Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
University Hospital Leipzig · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe multidisciplinary follow-up of patients with cleft lip with or without palate (CL/P) is organized differently in specialized centers worldwide. The aim of this study was to evaluate the different treatment needs of patients with different manifestations of CL/P and to potentially adapt the frequency and timing of checkup examinations accordingly.

designWe retrospectively analyzed the data of all patients attending the CL/P consultation hour at a tertiary care center between June 2005 and August 2020 (

resultsPatients with CLP made up the largest group (

conclusionAlthough there are differences between cleft entities, the treatment need of patients with orofacial clefts is generally high during the growth period. Patients with CL/A showed a similarly high treatment demand and should be monitored closely. A close follow-up for patients with diagnosis of CL/P is crucial and measures should be taken to increase participation in follow-up appointments.

Indexed as

Cleft LipCleft PalateFollow-Up StudiesHumansRetrospective Studiescleft entitycleft lip palatefollow-upmultidisciplinary

Identifiers

PMID34410173
PMCPMC9411700
OpenAlexW3193439562

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.