Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34409936›Full record

ArticleeLife2021

The whale shark genome reveals patterns of vertebrate gene family evolution.

Milton Tan, Anthony K Redmond, Helen Dooley, Ryo Nozu, Keiichi Sato, Shigehiro Kuraku, Sergey Koren, Adam M Phillippy, Alistair Dm Dove, Timothy Read

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. The evolution of tenascins.BMC ecology and evolution · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 8 institutions in 3 countries.

Milton TanIllinois Natural History Survey at University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Champaign, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-9803-0827
Anthony K RedmondSmurfit Institute of Genetics, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
Helen DooleyUniversity of Maryland School of Medicine, Institute of Marine & Environmental Technology, Baltimore, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-2570-574X
Ryo NozuOkinawa Churashima Research Center, Okinawa Churashima Foundation, Okinawa, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-1099-3152
Keiichi SatoOkinawa Churashima Research Center, Okinawa Churashima Foundation, Okinawa, Japan.
Shigehiro KurakuRIKEN Center for Biosystems Dynamics Research (BDR), RIKEN, Kobe, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-1464-8388
Sergey KorenNational Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, United States.
Adam M PhillippyNational Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, United States.
Alistair Dm DoveGeorgia Aquarium, Atlanta, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-3239-4772
Timothy ReadDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, United States.
National Institutes of Health · USOkinawa Churashima Foundation · JPEmory University · USFlorida Aquarium · USRIKEN Center for Biosystems Dynamics Research · JPTrinity College Dublin · IEUniversity of Illinois Urbana-Champaign · USUniversity of Maryland, Baltimore · US

Funding

Single-molecule sequence assembly and analysisZIAHG200398 · NHGRI · NATIONAL HUMAN GENOME RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI PHILLIPPY, ADAM · 2016 to 2025
$15.9M
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chondrichthyes (cartilaginous fishes) are fundamental for understanding vertebrate evolution, yet their genomes are understudied. We report long-read sequencing of the whale shark genome to generate the best gapless chondrichthyan genome assembly yet with higher contig contiguity than all other cartilaginous fish genomes, and studied vertebrate genomic evolution of ancestral gene families, immunity, and gigantism. We found a major increase in gene families at the origin of gnathostomes (jawed vertebrates) independent of their genome duplication. We studied vertebrate pathogen recognition receptors (PRRs), which are key in initiating innate immune defense, and found diverse patterns of gene family evolution, demonstrating that adaptive immunity in gnathostomes did not fully displace germline-encoded PRR innovation. We also discovered a new toll-like receptor (TLR29) and three NOD1 copies in the whale shark. We found chondrichthyan and giant vertebrate genomes had decreased substitution rates compared to other vertebrates, but gene family expansion rates varied among vertebrate giants, suggesting substitution and expansion rates of gene families are decoupled in vertebrate genomes. Finally, we found gene families that shifted in expansion rate in vertebrate giants were enriched for human cancer-related genes, consistent with gigantism requiring adaptations to suppress cancer.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularGenomeTranscriptomeAnimalsBiomarkers, TumorCell Transformation, NeoplasticFish ProteinsGene DuplicationGene Expression ProfilingGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticHumansImmunity, InnateNeoplasmsPhylogenyReceptors, ImmunologicSharksBiomarkers, TumorFish ProteinsReceptors, Immunologicchondrichthyesevolutionary biologyfishgeneticsgenomicsgnathostomeRhincodon typusvertebratewhale shark

Identifiers

PMID34409936
PMCPMC8455134
OpenAlexW3194949746

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.