Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34409891›Full record

Trial reportIntegrative cancer therapies

Multi-Center, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Exploratory Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of HAD-B1 for Dose-Finding in EGFR Mutation Positive and Locally Advanced or Metastatic NSCLC Subjects Who Need Afatinib Therapy.

Eun-Ju Ko, Eun-Bin Kwag, Ji Hye Park, So-Jung Park, Ji-Woong Son, Seong-Hun Yoon, Seong-Hun Shin, Hwa-Seung Yoo

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Integrative cancer therapies. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Eun-Ju KoDaejeon Korean Medicine Hospital of Daejeon University, Daejeon, Republic of Korea.
Eun-Bin KwagDaejeon Korean Medicine Hospital of Daejeon University, Daejeon, Republic of Korea.
Ji Hye ParkSeoul Korean Medicine Hospital of Daejeon University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
So-Jung ParkDaejeon Korean Medicine Hospital of Daejeon University, Daejeon, Republic of Korea.
Ji-Woong SonKonyang University Hospital, Daejeon, Republic of Korea.
Seong-Hun YoonPusan National University Yangsan Hospital, Yangsan, Republic of Korea.
Seong-Hun ShinKosin University Gospel Hospital, Pusan, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-5745-560X
Hwa-Seung YooDaejeon Korean Medicine Hospital of Daejeon University, Daejeon, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-1133-436X
Daejeon University · KRKonyang University Hospital · KRKosin University Gospel Hospital · KRPusan National University Yangsan Hospital · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Afatinib is a target anticancer drug of the second-generation EGFR TKI type, showing an advantage in treatment effect compared to conventional chemotherapy. However, patients on EGFR-TKI drugs also usually progress after 9 to 13 months according to secondary resistance. HAD-B1 is composed of drugs that are effective against lung cancer. This study is an exploratory study to evaluate the efficacy and safety between dosage groups by conducting a clinical trial in subjects requiring afatinib drug treatment in non-small cell lung cancer with EGFR mutation positive to determine the optimal dosage for HAD-B1 administration. At the final visit compared to before administration, each change in the disease control rate was measured according to the HAD-B1 doses of the test group 1 (972 mg), the test group 2 (1944 mg), and the control group. The efficacy and safety of HAD-B1 were compared and evaluated through sub-evaluation variables. As a result of the study, there was no statistically significant difference in the disease control rate at 12 weeks after dosing, but complete and partial remission were evaluated as 1 patient each in the test group 1, and none in the other groups. There was no statistically significant difference between groups in the sub-evaluation variable. In addition, there was no problem of safety from taking the test drug. However, the initially planned number of subjects was 66, but the number of enrolled subjects was only 14, which may limit the results of this study.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungLung NeoplasmsAfatinibErbB ReceptorsHumansMutationProtein Kinase InhibitorsAfatinibEGFR protein, humanErbB ReceptorsProtein Kinase Inhibitorsafatinibdisease control rateEGFR-TKIHAD-B1non-small cell lung cancer

Identifiers

PMID34409891
PMCPMC8381462
OpenAlexW3195145155

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.