Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34409874›Full record

ReviewTissue engineering. Part B, Reviews2022

Biomechanical Aspects of Osteochondral Regeneration: Implications and Strategies for Three-Dimensional Bioprinting.

Robert Choe, Eoin Devoy, Erfan Jabari, Jonathan D Packer, John P Fisher

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Tissue engineering. Part B, Reviews, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Three-dimensionally-printed biphasic PCL/Regenerative biomaterials · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Advances in Regenerative Sports Medicine Research.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Robert ChoeFischell Department of Bioengineering, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4834-4529
Eoin DevoyFischell Department of Bioengineering, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland, USA.
Erfan JabariFischell Department of Bioengineering, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland, USA.
Jonathan D PackerDepartment of Orthopaedics, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
John P FisherFischell Department of Bioengineering, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland, USA.
University of Maryland, College Park · USUniversity of Maryland, Baltimore · US

Funding

Training and Dissemination CoreP41EB023833 · NIBIB · UNIV OF MARYLAND, COLLEGE PARK · PI FISHER, JOHN P · 2017 to 2021
$6.2M
NIBIB NIH HHS P41 EB023833
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Osteoarthritis is among the most prevalent of musculoskeletal disorders in the world that causes joint pain, deformity, and limited range of movement. The resulting osteochondral defect can significantly decrease the patient's quality of life, but current treatment options have not demonstrated the capacity to fully regenerate the entire osteochondral microenvironment. Structurally, the osteochondral unit is a composite system composed of three layers-articular cartilage, calcified cartilage, and subchondral bone. Collectively these distinct layers contribute to the distinct biomechanical properties that maintain the health and aid in load transfer during joint articulation. The purpose of this review was to examine the role of the osteochondral interface in tissue engineering. Topics of discussion include the biomechanics of the osteochondral unit and an overview of various strategies for osteochondral interface tissue engineering, with a specific focus on three-dimensional bioprinting. The goal of this review was to elucidate the importance of the osteochondral interface and overview some strategies of developing an interface layer within tissue engineered scaffolds. Impact Statement This review provides an overview of interface tissue engineering for osteochondral regeneration. It offers a detailed investigation into the biomechanics of the osteochondral unit as it relates to tissue engineering, and highlights the strategies that have been utilized to develop the osteochondral interface within tissue engineering scaffolds.

Indexed as

BioprintingCartilage, ArticularHumansQuality of LifeTissue EngineeringTissue Scaffolds3D bioprintingcalcified cartilageinterface scaffoldosteochondral regenerationtissue engineering

Identifiers

PMID34409874
PMCPMC9419968
OpenAlexW3195698746

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.