ArticleOrthopaedic surgery2021
Utility of Ultrasound-Guided Anesthetic Intra-articular Injection to Estimate the Outcome of Hip Arthroscopy in Patients with Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome.
Article in Orthopaedic surgery, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Real-Time Biplane Versus Single-Plane US-guided Hip Joint Injection: A Single-Center Prospective Study.Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine · 2026Article
- The value of intra-articular corticosteroid injection in predicting pain relief following periacetabular osteotomy.Journal of hip preservation surgery · 2025Article
- Borderline Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip With Osseous Impingement as Distinct From Femoroacetabular Impingement and Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip.Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine · 2024Article
- Can intra-articular hip injections predict arthroscopy outcomes for femoroacetabular impingement syndrome? A systematic review.Journal of orthopaedics · 2024Review
- Injections prior to hip arthroscopy are associated with increased risk of repeat hip arthroscopy at 1 and 5 years.Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery · 2024Article
- Correlation Between Improvement in Pain After Ultrasound-Guided Intra-articular Hip Injection and Outcomes After Arthroscopy in Patients With Femoroacetabular Impingement.Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine · 2024Article
- Lateral Center-edge Angle of 18° (Bone-Edge): Threshold for Hip Arthroscopy Treatment in Patients with Borderline Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip?Orthopaedic surgery · 2023Article
- Does response to preoperative intra-articular anesthetic injections predict outcomes of femoroacetabular impingement syndrome?Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery · 2023Review
- Efficacy of regional anesthesia in hip preservation surgeries: a systematic review.Journal of hip preservation surgery · 2023Article
- Gadolinium injected concurrently with anesthetic can result in false-negative diagnostic intra-articular hip injections.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo investigate the effectiveness of ultrasound (US) guided intra-hip joint injection to estimate the outcome of hip arthroscopy in patients with femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) syndrome.
methodsPatients with FAI syndrome (n = 60) were prospectively enrolled in our study. Before hip arthroscopy, a mix of 4 mL 2% lidocaine and 4 mL 1% ropivacaine were injected into the hip joint under the guidance of US. The clinical efficacy of the intra-articular injection was evaluated by comparing the visual analog scale (VAS) and international hip outcome tool 12 (iHOT-12) results before and after the injection. The outcome of hip arthroscopy was evaluated by iHOT-12, the modified Harris hip score (MHHS), and the patient's satisfaction 12 months after the operation. The outcome of intra-articular injection and hip arthroscopy were compared. Factors related to the outcomes of hip arthroscopy were evaluated. The correlation between the efficacy of intra-hip joint injection and arthroscopy was evaluated.
resultsThe VAS of patients decreased from 11.3 ± 7.7 to 3.3 ± 4.5, and the iHOT-12 increased from 52.1 ± 23.2 to 84.1 ± 18.1 after intra-articular injection (all P < 0.001). The iHOT-12 score increased from 52.1 ± 23.2 to 78.9 ± 19.2, and the MHHS increased from 66.5 ± 6.8 to 81.6 ± 8.1 after hip arthroscopy (all P < 0.001). The satisfaction rate of arthroscopy, including very satisfied and effective patients, was 93.3%. Multi-variable logistic regression showed that only iHOT-12 improved value after injection was included in the regression formula of satisfaction, with the β of -0.154, standard error of 0.071, Wald value of 4.720, and OR of 0.857 (95%CI 0.746-0.985) (P = 0.03). Significant correlation was detected between iHOT-12 scores after intra-articular anesthesia and at 12 months after arthroscopy (r = 0.784, P < 0.001). So was the iHOT-12 improved value (r = 0.781, P < 0.001) and the iHOT-12 improved ratio (r = 0.848, P < 0.001). If we had performed arthroscopy only on patients with post-injection iHOT-12 score improvement ≥10, the satisfaction rate of arthroscopy would have increased to 96.6%.
conclusionsUS-guided intra-hip joint injection may provide a feasible way to estimate the outcome of hip arthroscopy in patients with FAI syndrome, and could be used as a method for indication selection of hip arthroscopy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.