ArticleEnvironmental science and pollution research international2022
Reuse of treated wastewater and non-potable groundwater in the manufacture of concrete: major challenge of environmental preservation.
Article in Environmental science and pollution research international, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Influence of Water Source Quality on Concrete Performance: A Mechanism-Based Systematic Review and Engineering Evaluation Framework.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Performance and environmental assessment of concrete made with treated industrial wastewater.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Eco-friendly concrete: Combining treated wastewater and recycled aggregates.Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This work concerns the reuse of treated wastewater from Er-Rachidia wastewater treatment plant (WWTP) in the mixing of ordinary C20/25 concrete, to reduce the overexploitation of non-potable groundwater, avoid its discharge into watercourses and reduce the risk of environmental pollution due to its mineral and organic matter load. In this respect, three types of mixing water were used in this study: drinking water (DW), non-potable groundwater (GW), and treated wastewater (TW). The results recorded for each type of mixing water, in the fresh and hardened state of concretes, were compared with the requirements of the standards. The obtained results show that the treated wastewater does not have any adverse effect upon the quality of the concrete; it has shown an improvement of the mechanical strength from the first stage, a similar density, setting time, and porosity and a slight decrease of the workability compared with the control concrete. A one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) of the mechanical performance of concrete at different cure times (7, 14, 28, and 90 days) has shown that there is no significant decrease in the mechanical performance of concretes based on TW and GW compared with concretes formulated with DW. Through this study, the substitution of drinking water by treated TW and GW will help to minimize the footprint of construction materials on natural resources. From a point of view of the mechanical performance, TW and GW improve the mechanical performance of concrete. Additionally, it makes wastewater treatment plants more economically attractive and contributes to sustainable development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
34409534What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.