Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34409501›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of colorectal disease2021

Low anterior resection syndrome: can it be prevented?

Alfredo Annicchiarico, Jacopo Martellucci, Stefano Solari, Maximilian Scheiterle, Carlo Bergamini, Paolo Prosperi

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of colorectal disease, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. A multicentre prospective study of anal function after laparoscopic ultra-low rectal cancer surgery using a mixed-effects model.Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland · 2025
    Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Alfredo AnnicchiaricoDepartment of Medicine and Surgery, University of Parma, Parma, Italy. alfredoannicchiarico90@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3882-776X
Jacopo MartellucciEmergency Surgery, Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7437-9098
Stefano SolariDepartment of Morphology, Surgery and Experimental Medicine, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7719-7786
Maximilian ScheiterleEmergency Surgery, Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6522-9891
Carlo BergaminiEmergency Surgery, Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7277-6735
Paolo ProsperiEmergency Surgery, Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6741-0800
Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi · ITUniversity of Ferrara · ITUniversity of Parma · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Surgery remains the cardinal treatment in colorectal cancers but changes in bowel habits after rectal cancer surgery are common and disabling conditions that affect patients' quality of life. Low anterior resection syndrome is a disorder of bowel function after rectal resection resulting in a lowering of the QoL and recently has been defined by an international working group not only by specified symptoms but also by their consequences. This review aims to explore an extensive bibliographic research on preventive strategies for LARS. All "modifiable variables," quantified by the LARS Score, such as type of anastomosis, neoadjuvant therapy, surgical strategy, and diverting stoma, were evaluated, while "non-modifiable variables" such as age, sex, BMI, ASA, preoperative TMN, tumor height, and type of mesorectal excision were excluded from the comparative analysis. The role of defunctioning stoma, local excision, neoadjuvant radiotherapy, and non operative management seems to significantly affect risk of LARS, while type of anastomosis and surgical TME approach do not impact on LARS incidence or gravity in the long term period. Although it is established that some variables are associated with a greater onset of LARS, in clinical practice, technical difficulties and oncological limits often make difficult the application of some prevention plans. Transtomal irrigations, intraoperative neuromonitoring, pelvic floor rehabilitation before stoma closure, and early transanal irrigation represent new arguments of study in preventive strategies which could, if not eliminate the symptoms, at least mitigate them.

Indexed as

ProctectomyRectal NeoplasmsHumansPostoperative ComplicationsQuality of LifeSyndromeBowel dysfunctionColorectal cancerFunctional outcomesLARSLow anterior resection syndromePrevention

Identifiers

PMID34409501
OpenAlexW3193347610

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.