ArticleDer Urologe. Ausg. A2022
[Antibiotic prophylaxis for transrectal prostate biopsy : In the context of restricted indications for fluoroquinolones and antibiotic stewardship].
Article in Der Urologe. Ausg. A, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Cotrimoxazole and targeted antibiotic prophylaxis for transrectal prostate biopsy: a single-center study.World journal of urology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTransrectal prostate biopsy (TRPB) is the gold standard for prostate cancer diagnosis and among the most common urological interventions. Short-term antibiotic prophylaxis (PAP) is recommended for TRPB. Fluoroquinolone-PAP as standard of care needs to be revaluated due to the restrictions on the use of fluoroquinolone antibiotics by the German Federal Institute for Drugs and Medical Devices.
objectivesThe aim of the study was to analyze clinical practice of PAP for TRPB with focus on infectious complications and potential differences between fluoroquinolone-PAP and cotrimoxazole-PAP.
methodsWe performed a retrospective monocentric study of clinical and microbiological characteristics of patients with TRPB between 3 January 2019 and 28 January 2021.
resultsA total of 508 men were included; median age was 68 years. In all, 55.9% of our cohort received cotrimoxazole-PAP and 40.0% fluoroquinolone-PAP. Postinterventional complications occurred in 5.5%, of those 50.0% were infectious complications. Complication rate did not differ between patients with fluoroquinolone-PAP and cotrimoxazole-PAP. Urinary cultures in case of postinterventional complications yielded pathogens with antimicrobial resistance against the used PAP substance indicating selection of resistant bacteria.
conclusionCotrimoxazole-PAP for TRPB is not associated with an increase of infectious complications compared to fluoroquinolone-PAP. Cultures obtained prior to TRPB to identify antimicrobial resistance facilitate targeted PAP and therefore can reduce complications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.