Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34409211›Full record

ArticleAdvances in radiation oncology

Tumor Treating Fields for Ovarian Carcinoma: A Modeling Study.

Edwin Lok, Pyay San, Victoria White, Olivia Liang, Page C Widick, Sindhu Pisati Reddy, Eric T Wong

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Advances in radiation oncology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Hydrogel and scalp/skin conductivities impact dose from tumor treating fields.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Edwin LokBrain Tumor Center & Neuro-Oncology Unit, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts.
Pyay SanBrain Tumor Center & Neuro-Oncology Unit, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts.
Victoria WhiteBrain Tumor Center & Neuro-Oncology Unit, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts.
Olivia LiangBrain Tumor Center & Neuro-Oncology Unit, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts.
Page C WidickDivision of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts.
Sindhu Pisati ReddyBrain Tumor Center & Neuro-Oncology Unit, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts.
Eric T WongBrain Tumor Center & Neuro-Oncology Unit, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeSince the inception of tumor treating fields (TTFields) therapy as a Food and Drug Administration-approved treatment with known clinical efficacy against recurrent and newly diagnosed glioblastoma, various in silico modeling studies have been performed in an effort to better understand the distribution of applied electric fields throughout the human body for various malignancies or metastases. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Postacquisition attenuation-corrected positron emission tomography-computed tomography image data sets from 2 patients with ovarian carcinoma were used to fully segment various intrapelvic and intra-abdominal gross anatomic structures. A 3-dimensional finite element mesh model was generated and then solved for the distribution of applied electric fields, rate of energy deposition, and current density at the clinical target volumes (CTVs) and other intrapelvic and intra-abdominal structures. Electric field-volume histograms, specific absorption rate-volume histograms, and current density-volume histograms were generated, by which plan quality metrics were derived from and used to evaluate relative differences in field coverage between models under various conditions.

resultsTTFields therapy distribution throughout the pelvis and abdomen was largely heterogeneous, where specifically the field intensity at the CTV was heavily influenced by surrounding anatomic structures as well as its shape and location. The electric conductivity of the CTV had a direct effect on the field strength within itself, as did the position of the arrays on the surface of the pelvis and/or abdomen.

conclusionThe combined use of electric field-volume histograms, specific absorption rate-volume histograms, current density-volume histograms, and plan quality metrics enables a personalized method to dosimetrically evaluate patients receiving TTFields therapy for ovarian carcinoma when certain patient- and tumor-specific factors are integrated with the treatment plan.

Identifiers

PMID34409211
PMCPMC8361065

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.