ArticleBone reports2021
Bilateral atypical fractures of the femur: Ten years AFTER ten years of bisphosphonate therapy.
Article in Bone reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Risk factors for atypical femur fractures with and without bisphosphonate treatment: a national nested case-control study.JBMR plus · 2026Article
- Review
- Bilateral Atypical Femoral Fractures after Bisphosphonate Treatment for Osteoporosis: A Literature Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAtypical femur fracture (AFF) is a clinically important complication of bisphosphonate (BP) use in the treatment of osteoporosis. The benefits of long-term BP therapy in preventing osteoporotic fractures have been shown to outweigh the risks of treatment. Discontinuation of BPs or "drug holidays" have been implemented as a strategy to reduce the risk of rare complications such as AFF. CASE REPORT: We present the case of a 70-year-old postmenopausal woman who suffered bilateral AFF ten years after discontinuation of BP treatment. Management of this patient included fixation of the complete AFF with an intramedullary rod. A single dose of denosumab was administered prior to referral to endocrinology and seemed to contribute to callus formation. Denosumab was discontinued to prevent progression of the contralateral incomplete AFF. Teriparatide was indicated for the treatment of this patient's osteoporosis and also led to the resolution of the incomplete AFF.
conclusionPatients receiving long-term BP therapy should be periodically reevaluated in order to maximize the benefit and minimize the risk of treatment. Current research supports the implementation of drug holidays to decrease the risk of AFF; however, this case report confirms the need for continued monitoring after discontinuation of BP therapy. Additionally, our review of current literature highlights the need for more specific research regarding duration of BP treatment and drug holidays.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.