ArticleERJ open research2021
Biologicals in childhood severe asthma: the European PERMEABLE survey on the
Article in ERJ open research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- Emerging perspectives in respiratory allergic diseases: a review of future directions.Frontiers in allergy · 2026Review
- Severe Paediatric Asthma Collaborative in Europe: real-world data on children on biologics.ERJ open research · 2025Article
- Advancements in Biologic Therapies for Pediatric Asthma: Emerging Therapies and Future Directions.Cureus · 2025Review
- Real-world evidence on biologic use in paediatric asthma: there but not there yet?ERJ open research · 2025Article
- The new biologic drugs: Which children with asthma should get what?Pediatric pulmonology · 2024Review
- Severe asthma care trajectories: the French RAMSES cohort.ERJ open research · 2024Article
- Early Assessment of Efficacy and Safety of Biologics in Pediatric Allergic Diseases: Preliminary Results from a Prospective Real-World Study.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Unanswered questions on the use of biologics in pediatric asthma.The World Allergy Organization journal · 2023Review
- Developments in the Management of Severe Asthma in Children and Adolescents: Focus on Dupilumab and Tezepelumab.Paediatric drugs · 2023Review
- Severe Asthma and Biological Therapies: Now and the Future.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Review
- Narrative review to capture patients' perceptions and opinions about non-response and response to biological therapy for severe asthma.The European respiratory journal · 2023Review
- Effects of Adherence to Once-Daily Treatment on Lung Function, Bronchial Hyperreactivity and Health Outcomes in Adolescents with Mild-to-Moderate Asthmoka: A Twelve-Month Survey.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Biologic Therapies in Pediatric Asthma.Journal of personalized medicine · 2022Review
- Precision Medicine and Childhood Asthma: A Guide for the Unwary.Journal of personalized medicine · 2022Review
- Severe pediatric asthma therapy: Dupilumab.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
47 authors at 20 institutions in 26 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionSevere asthma is a rare disease in children, for which three biologicals, anti-immunoglobulin E, anti-interleukin-5 and anti-IL4RA antibodies, are available in European countries. While global guidelines exist on who should receive biologicals, knowledge is lacking on how those guidelines are implemented in real life and which unmet needs exist in the field. In this survey, we aimed to investigate the
methodsStructured interviews regarding experience with biologicals, regulations on access to the different treatment options, drug selection, therapy success and discontinuation of therapy were performed. Content analysis was used to analyse data.
resultsWe interviewed 37 experts from 25 European countries and Turkey and found a considerable range in the number of children treated with biologicals per centre. All participating countries provide public access to at least one biological. Most countries allow different medical disciplines to prescribe biologicals to children with asthma, and only a few restrict therapy to specialised centres. We observed significant variation in the time point at which treatment success is assessed, in therapy duration and in the success rate of discontinuation. Most participating centres intend to apply a personalised medicine approach in the future to match patients
conclusionSubstantial differences exist in the management of childhood severe asthma across Europe, and the need for further studies on biomarkers supporting selection of biologicals, on criteria to assess therapy response and on how/when to end therapy in stable patients is evident.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.