ArticleCureus2021
Successful Treatment of Severe Gamma-Hydroxybutyric Acid Withdrawal Syndrome With Dantrolene.
Article in Cureus, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The prevalence of gamma-butyrolactone/gamma-hydroxybutyric acid (GBL/GHB) use is increasing. The gravity and number of incidents with this drug are relatively high. A feared complication is addiction and its withdrawal syndrome, which can be life-threatening and is difficult to treat. We present the case of a 31-year-old man, admitted to the ICU because of accidental GBL withdrawal. The patient was tachycardic, sweaty, extremely agitated, and showed signs of psychosis. High doses of benzodiazepines, propofol, sufentanil, and quetiapine could not sedate the patient sufficiently. Dosing with pharmaceutical GHB was challenging due to severe gastric retention. As the patient developed hyperthermia and rhabdomyolysis, signs of a neuroleptic malignant syndrome (NMS), he was treated with dantrolene. After 14 days, the patient was discharged to a psychiatric clinic for further treatment. GHB affects multiple neurotransmitters and chronic use causes the up- or down-regulation of several receptors. During GHB withdrawal, the patient developed a hyperexcitable state, in which there was insufficient gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) (the most important inhibiting neurotransmitter) and an abundance of glutamate (the most important excitatory neurotransmitter). High-dose benzodiazepines are often advocated as the first-line treatment, but benzodiazepine resistance has frequently been reported. Therefore, treatment with pharmaceutical GHB is advised. Patients with GHB-withdrawal who have clinical signs of NMS can be treated with dantrolene because it regulates the distorted calcium secretion and affects the serotonin and cholinergic system.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.