Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34408931›Full record

ReviewCureus2021

Impact of Cassia Bark Consumption on Glucose and Lipid Control in Type 2 Diabetes: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Anindita Mandal, Suresh Sharma, Ritu Rani, Shashi Ranjan, Ravi Kant, Anissa Mirza

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Anindita MandalNursing, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh, IND.
Suresh SharmaNursing, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Jodhpur, IND.
Ritu RaniNursing, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh, IND.
Shashi RanjanBiochemistry, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh, IND.
Ravi KantGeneral Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh, IND.
Anissa MirzaBiochemistry, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh, IND.
All India Institute of Medical Sciences Jodhpur · INAll India Institute of Medical Sciences Rishikesh

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Control of diabetes is a constant challenge and natural remedies are being searched along with modern medicine. The effectiveness of cinnamon in managing it lacks consensus. Besides this, earlier trials had a variant in the type of product they used, quantity, duration, the form of molecules, etc. So, we aimed to measure the impact of cassia ground bark powder consumption, 1-2 gm/day for 90 days, in lowering plasma glucose and lipids among those with type 2 diabetes. The authors searched the PubMed, Medline, Embase, CINAHL, Clinical Key, Ovid, and Scopus databases and the Cochrane Central Register (last search December 30, 2020) with the MeSH terms and keywords of cinnamon, cassia cinnamon, Chinese cinnamon, and type 2 diabetes mellitus to conclude the effects of cassia cinnamon on diabetes based on the evidence of human clinical trials that reported at least one of the following: glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1C), fasting blood glucose, total cholesterol, triglycerides, low-density lipoprotein (LDL), and high-density lipoprotein (HDL). Weighted mean differences were calculated by using the random-effect model of RevMan software (The Cochrane Collaboration, London, UK), and the pooled analysis found an insignificant reduction of the outcome variable (p>0.05).

Indexed as

chinese cinnamoncinnamomum cassialipid profileserum blood glucosetypes 2 diabetes

Identifiers

PMID34408931
PMCPMC8361532
OpenAlexW3181070232

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.