ArticleRegenerative biomaterials2021
3D bioprinting of conductive hydrogel for enhanced myogenic differentiation.
Article in Regenerative biomaterials, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
27 citing papers in PubMed.
- Engineered muscle drives bone repair and functional healing after composite musculoskeletal injury.Biomaterials · 2026Article
- Electroconductive Soft Microcarriers for Suspension Culture of Skeletal Muscle Cells.Macromolecular bioscience · 2026Article
- Recent advances in electroactive biomaterials and electrical stimulation for skeletal muscle regeneration: materials, strategies, and mechanistic insights.Materials today. Bio · 2026Review
- Nanotechnology-mediated strategies for skeletal muscle repair and regeneration: targeted intervention, functional remodeling, and translational challenges.Journal of nanobiotechnology · 2026Review
- Graphene and TiACS applied bio materials · 2026Article
- Innovations in skeletal muscle regeneration: from physiology to bioengineering approaches for repair and restoration.Frontiers in physiology · 2026Review
- Engineered Hydrogels for Musculoskeletal Regeneration: Advanced Synthesis Strategies and Therapeutic Efficacy in Preclinical Models.Polymers · 2025Review
- Ultrasound-driven wireless piezoelectric hydrogel synergizes with cotransplantation of NSCs-hUCMSCs for structural and functional recovery in spinal cord injury.Materials today. Bio · 2025Article
- Evaluating the potential of graphene oxide to promote skeletal muscle complex regeneration.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025Article
- Engineering of tissue in microphysiological systems demonstrated by modelling skeletal muscle.Regenerative biomaterials · 2025Review
- Advancements in skeletal muscle tissue engineering: strategies for repair and regeneration of skeletal muscle beyond self-repair.Regenerative biomaterials · 2025Review
- Biomaterials for neuroengineering: applications and challenges.Regenerative biomaterials · 2025Review
- Heterogeneous and Composite Bioinks for 3D-Bioprinting of Complex Tissue.Biomedical materials & devices (New York, N.Y.) · 2025Review
- Design approaches for 3D cell culture and 3D bioprinting platforms.Biophysics reviews · 2024Review
- Navigating the Immunological Crossroads: Mesenchymal Stem/Stromal Cells as Architects of Inflammatory Harmony in Tissue-Engineered Constructs.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- 3D printing materials and 3D printed surgical devices in oral and maxillofacial surgery: design, workflow and effectiveness.Regenerative biomaterials · 2024Review
- Decellularized extracellular matrix-based composite scaffolds for tissue engineering and regenerative medicine.Regenerative biomaterials · 2024Review
- Designing Biomimetic Conductive Gelatin-Chitosan-Carbon Black Nanocomposite Hydrogels for Tissue Engineering.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- 3D and 4D Bioprinting Technologies: A Game Changer for the Biomedical Sector?Annals of biomedical engineering · 2023Review
- Nanocomposite Bioprinting for Tissue Engineering Applications.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Recently, hydrogels have gained enormous interest in three-dimensional (3D) bioprinting toward developing functional substitutes for tissue remolding. However, it is highly challenging to transmit electrical signals to cells due to the limited electrical conductivity of the bioprinted hydrogels. Herein, we demonstrate the 3D bioprinting-assisted fabrication of a conductive hydrogel scaffold based on poly-3,4-ethylene dioxythiophene (PEDOT) nanoparticles (NPs) deposited in gelatin methacryloyl (GelMA) for enhanced myogenic differentiation of mouse myoblasts (C2C12 cells). Initially, PEDOT NPs are dispersed in the hydrogel uniformly to enhance the conductive property of the hydrogel scaffold. Notably, the incorporated PEDOT NPs showed minimal influence on the printing ability of GelMA. Then, C2C12 cells are successfully encapsulated within GelMA/PEDOT conductive hydrogels using 3D extrusion bioprinting. Furthermore, the proliferation, migration and differentiation efficacies of C2C12 cells in the highly conductive GelMA/PEDOT composite scaffolds are demonstrated using various
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.