Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34408557›Full record

ArticleHong Kong journal of occupational therapy : HKJOT2021

An examination of the psychometric properties of the occupational identity questionnaire for community-living elderly who require care.

Masataka Shikata, Hiroyuki Notoh, Kazuya Shinohara, Kenji Yabuwaki, Yoshikazu Ishii, Takashi Yamada, Renée R Taylor

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Hong Kong journal of occupational therapy : HKJOT, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Masataka ShikataTokoha University, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0383-5455
Hiroyuki NotohTokoha University, Japan.
Kazuya ShinoharaTokoha University, Japan.
Kenji YabuwakiTohoku Fukushi University, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6856-9952
Yoshikazu IshiiTokyo Metropolitan University, Japan.
Takashi YamadaTokyo Metropolitan University, Japan.
Renée R TaylorUniversity of Illinois at Chicago, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2549-1531

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionAuthors created an Occupational Identity Questionnaire Provisional version (OIQ-P) to assess occupational identity for elderly individuals. The purpose of this study was to examine the psychometric properties of the OIQ-P.

methodsParticipants included 135 (42 males) elderly who lived locally and required care or support. OIQ-P was evaluated in terms of structural validity, criterion validity and internal consistency.

resultsBased on the results of an exploratory factor analysis and confirmatory factor analysis, an OIQ with a factor structure of 3 factors and 14 items was created. Rasch rating scale model revealed that 14 participants and 1 item did not fit the goodness of fit, nevertheless, the overall result was good. Spearman's rank correlation coefficient indicates that there was a law correlation between OIQ and the occupational identity scale of the Occupational Performance History Interview Version 2. In terms of internal consistency, the person separation index and person separation reliability coefficient were 2.30 and 0.84, respectively.

conclusionThis study confirmed the structural validity, criterion validity and internal consistency for the OIQ. To enhance the clinical utility of the OIQ, it is necessary to examine the interpretability and conduct an intervention study using the OIQ.

Indexed as

assessmentelderly peopleModel of human occupationoccupational identityoccupational therapy

Identifiers

PMID34408557
PMCPMC8366208

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.