ArticleCancer management and research2021
Diverse Distribution and Gene Expression on the 21-Gene Recurrence Assay in Breast Cancer Patients with Locoregional Recurrence Versus Distant Metastasis.
Article in Cancer management and research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Value of the 21-gene expression assay in predicting locoregional recurrence rates in estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.Breast cancer research and treatment · 2022Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIt remains uncertain whether the 21-gene recurrence score (RS) of a primary tumor has selective prognostic value for locoregional recurrence (LRR) or distant metastasis (DM). The current study aimed to compare the distribution and single-gene expression on the RS panel in breast cancer patients with LRR versus DM.
methodsConsecutive early breast cancer patients who had been operated on at the Comprehensive Breast Health Center, Ruijin Hospital from January 2009 to December 2016 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were divided into LRR, DM, and no-recurrence groups according to the first reported recurrent event. Comparison and subgroup analysis of 21-gene RS, RS category, and single-gene expression on the RS panel were conducted among patients with different recurrence status.
resultsA total of 1,287 patients were included, with median follow-up of 61.5 months, and 27, 47, and 1,213 patients were classified as LRR, DM, and no recurrence groups, respectively. RS was significantly diversely distributed among the three groups (
conclusionRS was differently distributed between recurrent and nonrecurrent patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.